State of Florida Erosion and Sediment Control Designer and Reviewer Manual (TPD0706030)

This page intentionally left blank

Table of Contents

SECTION I: GENERAL INFORMATION

INTRODUCTION

PURPOSE OF THE MANUAL THREE BASIC DEFINITIONS SEDIMENT LOADING

Impact to Water Bodies

Nutrients, Pesticides, and Heavy Metals

Hydrocarbons and Other Wastes Found in Runoff Waters The Importance of Vegetation

Identifying the Sources

REGULATIONS AND STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS

CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IDENTIFICATION OF OPERATORS CGP REQUIREMENTS

Understand the CGP and Develop a SWPPP

Complete an NOI Application Inspections

Notice of Termination (NOT) Retention of Records General Comments

SECTION II: DEVELOPING EFFECTIVE SWPPP’S AND E&SC DRAWINGS

CONTENTS OF A SWPPP

NARRATIVE REPORT

Designer Certification Requirement Contractor Certification Requirement

CALCULATIONS

EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DRAWINGS RECORD REQUIREMENTS

SWPPP and E&SC Drawing Update Requirements

DEVELOPING EFFECTIVE E&SC DRAWINGS

THE IMPORTANCE OF PERTINENT DATA

Collecting Data

Interpreting and Evaluating Data

DEVELOPING EFFECTIVE E&SC DRAWINGS

Title Sheet

Pre Grading Drawings During Grading Drawings After Grading Drawings

Typical Detail and Specification Sheets Miscellaneous Comments

E&SC Drawing Summary

SECTION III: EROSION CONTROL METHODS

INTRODUCTION

USE OF VEGETATION

MAINTAINING ESTABLISHED VEGETATION VEGETATIVE FILTER STRIPS ESTABLISHING VEGETATION

Sod

Permanent Vegetation Temporary Vegetation Planting Seed

Pure Live Seed Rates vs. Bulk Rates Methods of Planting Seed

Polymer Enhanced Soil Stabilization

MULCHES

Dry Mulches Compost Materials Hydraulic Mulches

SOIL BINDERS

ROLLED EROSION CONTROL PRODUCTS (RECP’S)

RECPS FOR DISTURBED SLOPES

SOFT ARMORING RECPS FOR CONCENTRATED FLOWS

Small Drainage Channels RECPs

Selecting a RECP for Small Drainage Channels

RUNOFF CONTROL STRUCTURES DIVERSION DIKES AND CONVEYANCE CHANNELS BASIN SLOPE DRAINS

ROADWAY SLOPE DRAINS

CHANNEL CHECK STRUCTURES

Spacing of Check Structures

EXAMPLES

CHANNEL RECP FOR A SPECIFIC FLOW BASIN SLOPE DRAIN

ROADWAY SLOPE DRAIN

SECTION IV: SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS (SCS’S)

INTRODUCTION

DESIGNING SCSS INTO AN E&SC DRAWING DEFINING SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS

EFFECTIVENESS OF SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM OUTLET STRUCTURES

Surface Skimmers

Perforated Riser Pipes

DEWATERING ACTIVITIES

TYPES OF DEWATERING METHODS

Rim Ditching

Sock Pipe/Horizontal Wells Well Point Systems

TURBIDITY MONITORING FOR OFF-SITE DISCHARGE USING SCSS FOR DEWATERING

INCREASING THE EFFICIENCY OF A SCS

Pre-Sedimentation Basins

Barriers for Pre-Sedimentation Basins

USE OF POLYMERS OR ALUM

Steps for Introducing Polymers into Runoff Waters Sediment Retention Barriers Using Polymers Runoff Water Sediment Removal using Alum

EXAMPLES

SCS EFFECTIVENESS OF AN EXISTING POND SIZING A DEWATERING SCS

BUILDER PRE-SEDIMENTATION BASIN LINEAR ROAD PRE-SEDIMENTATION BASIN

SECTION V: TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION SITE BMPS

INTRODUCTION

USING BARRIERS TO REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM RUNOFF WATERS

LIMITATION OF BALE BARRIERS SILT-FENCE BARRIERS

FIBER LOGS

TEMPORARY COMPOST BERMS

DITCH BOTTOM INLET (CATCH BASIN) BARRIERS BARRIERS FOR STORM SEWER CURB INLET OPENINGS

Curb and Gutter Sediment Containment System

Inlet Inserts

Cellular Confinement Systems

USING POLYMERS TO INCREASE SEDIMENT REMOVAL FROM RUNOFF WATERS USING BMPS WHEN BUILDING BOX CULVERTS

APPENDIX I

COASTAL APPLICATIONS

APPENDIX II

DEWATERING

APPENDIX III

POLYMERS AND ALUM

APPENDIX IV INSPECTION FORMS SCHEDULING FORMS

APPENDIX V

VERTICAL/BIG BOX E&SC PLAN HIGHWAY E&SC PLAN

TYPICAL DETAILS

Acknowledgments

Development of this manual was funded by the Florida Department of Transportation and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection.

With Special Thanks to the Manual Advisory Committee

Fernando Ascanio, FDOT Josh Boan, FDOT

Manoj Chopra, UCF Susan Davis, SJRWMD Cammie Dewey, SJRWMD Jerry Fifield, HDI

Carol Griggs, SJRWMD Steve Iwinski, APS

Eric Livingston, FDEP Paul O’Neil, SWFWMD Rick Renna, FDOT Andi Reyes, SFWMD Heather Ritchie, FDEP Larry Ritchie, FDOT David Sadler, FDOT Jenny Sargent, FDOT Jim Smoot, USGS Marty Wanielista, UCF Ben Watson, FDOT Molly Wood, USGS

Ed Yaun, SFWMD

This manual was edited by Ryan Browne, UCF and approved for publication.

© June 2007

i

This page intentionally left blank

SECTION I

GENERAL INFORMATION

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 1

PURPOSE OF THE MANUAL…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 1

THREE BASIC DEFINITIONS……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 2

SEDIMENT LOADING………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 3

Impact to Water Bodies…………………………………………………………………………………………….. 3

Nutrients, Pesticides, and Heavy Metals……………………………………………………………………… 3

Hydrocarbons and Other Wastes Found in Runoff Waters…………………………………………….. 3

The Importance of Vegetation……………………………………………………………………………………. 4

Identifying the Sources……………………………………………………………………………………………… 4

REGULATIONS AND STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS……………………………………………… 4

CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 5

IDENTIFICATION OF OPERATORS…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 6

CGP REQUIREMENTS………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 6

Understand the CGP and Develop a SWPPP………………………………………………………………. 6

Complete an NOI Application……………………………………………………………………………………. 6

Inspections………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 7

Notice of Termination……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 7

Retention of Records…………………………………………………………………………………………………. 8

General Comments…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 8

INTRODUCTION

With the adoption of the statewide stormwater rule in 1982, Florida was the first state in the country to require the treatment of stormwater from all new development. The stormwater rule is a technology-based rule relying upon a performance standard (environmental goal) and Best Management Practices (BMPs) design criteria that are presumed to meet the goal. The performance standards are set forth in the Water Resource Implementation Rule (Chapter 62-40, F.A.C.).

Performance standards for erosion and sediment control during grading is to retain sediment on- site, with a backstop that no discharge shall violate the State of Florida’s water quality standard for turbidity. Thus, goals of Florida’s stormwater regulatory program and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) are to protect water quality and to minimize erosion and sedimentation by requiring the use of effective BMPs during and after grading.

Additionally, as mandated by the Clean Water Act (CWA), permits must be obtained for stormwater discharges from construction sites that meet or exceed the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)’s criteria (see http://www.epa.gov/region5/water/cwa.htm). The EPA has the responsibility of administering CWA requirements by requiring National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) discharge permits. FDEP implements the NPDES program in Florida and to issue Florida NPDES discharge permits. By reviewing http://www.dep.state.fl.us/water/stormwater/npdes/index.htm, readers of this manual can obtain more detailed information on Florida statutory requirements and FDEP programs and requirements.

Purpose of the Manual

This manual will assist designers and reviewers in providing meaningful and practical Erosion and Sediment Control (E&SC) drawings as part of the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for the contractor to implement. Preparation and review of SWPPP and E&SC drawings need to be done by, or under the supervision of, professionals having demonstrative erosion and sediment control experience and skills necessary for development and review of effective and practical documents. These individuals are identified throughout this manual as Designers. It is important to note that additional qualifications may be required by governmental agencies, such as having construction field experience, supplementary training and education, passing an examination, and so forth.

This manual has been developed to strive toward a consistent level of technical expertise and professional conduct for designers and reviewers developing and reviewing E&SC drawings and SWPPP. These are required not only to meet NPDES stormwater requirements but are also an integral part of the stormwater management plan that must be approved by FDEP or the Water Management Districts (WMDs) to obtain a Florida stormwater or Environmental Resource Permit (ERP). Ultimately, the guidance in this manual strives to ensure the desired benefits of stormwater management systems are being achieved.

Three Basic Definitions

Natural erosion occurs at a relatively slow rate; however, accelerated erosion is primarily caused by the removal of natural vegetation or alteration of the ground contour by land disturbing and construction activities. The nature of construction activities will result in increased erosion rates, transportation of sediment by runoff, and create problems associated with sedimentation. The purpose of this manual is to present methods that Designers can use and reviewers will recognize to reduce sediment in runoff waters and minimize the erosion process on sites where construction activity is occurring. It is important that Designers and reviewers understand the following three basic definitions:

• Erosion:     The process by which rainfall, wind and water dislodges soil particles.

►      Splash erosion is the dislodging of soil particles by raindrop impacts, resulting in the dispersal and mobilization of the soil particles.

►      Sheet flow erosion is the uniform removal of saturated soil particles conveyed in runoff waters.

►      Rill erosion is a long, narrow depression or soil incision caused by increased topographic relief and higher runoff velocities. They are the result of concentrated flows that result in vertical (meaning, incising into the ground) and sheet flow erosion.

►      Gully erosion is the deep and wide depression caused by concentrated flows.

►      Stream bank erosion is the removal of soil by a natural drainage pattern, such as toe cutting and bank sloughing.

►      Shoreline erosion is the removal of soil by high-energy wave action, resulting in sloughing and mass wasting.

• Sediment: Soil particles suspended in, or moved by, stormwater runoff.
• Sedimentation:      The deposition of sediment.

Some of the factors influencing erosion include soil characteristics, existing vegetative cover, topography and climate. Soil properties which influence erosion by rainfall and stormwater runoff are those which affect the infiltration capacity of a soil and those which affect the resistance of the soil to detachment and transport by flowing or falling water. Vegetative cover plays an extremely important role in reducing erosion and can be controlled during land disturbing activities.

Sequentially scheduling and limiting the removal of vegetation and decreasing the area and duration of exposure can significantly reduce soil erosion and sedimentation. Topographic characteristics of the watershed can influence the amount and rate of stormwater runoff since slope length and gradient directly influence the volume and velocity of runoff and erosion risks. Climate, especially rainfall frequency, intensity and duration are fundamental factors in determining the amount of runoff. As volume and velocity increase, the capacity of runoff to detach and transport soil particles also increases.

This manual will provide guidelines for developing and reviewing effective E&SC drawings that incorporate methods for removing sediment from runoff waters and minimize erosion in a cost effective and practical manner that protects the environment while construction activities occur.

Designers must confer with the appropriate Water Management District (WMD), as well as the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) office when completing projects within their jurisdiction to ensure that they address all necessary environmental concerns.

Sediment Loading

Impact to Water Bodies

When Total Suspended Solids (TSS) occur in large quantities, degraded water quality can be harmful to plants and animals and interfere with such life functions as photosynthesis, respiration, growth, and reproduction. Since construction projects can be one source of soil particles that fill Florida’s streams, lakes, canals, and shorelines, it is important to understand how to control sediment both during and following land disturbance activities.

As construction activities disturb land, erosion occurs during rainfall or wind events. Once suspended in water, soil particles may become a major water pollutant. For example, sediment loading causes the following:

• Construction areas can produce 10 to 20 times more than soil particles lost from lands where vegetation exists.
• Reservoirs, harbors, and canals to clog with silt.
• Loss of recreational areas and wildlife habitat.
  • Reduces the beneficial uses of water for humans and can harm plants, animals, and aquatic life.

Nutrients, Pesticides, and Heavy Metals

Sediment loading from construction areas may also increase the amount of nutrients in water. Nutrients (especially phosphorus and nitrates) may come from fertilizers used at construction sites to aid in the establishment of vegetation. When runoff waters carry sediment downstream into water, plants that live in water use the nutrients to increase the biomass, which robs the water of oxygen, which kills aquatic organisms, including fish.

In addition to nutrients, herbicides and pesticides may also exist in construction site soils. When runoff events occur, these harmful chemicals are also carried with the sediments. In addition, improper application of pesticides can also result in the direct contamination of water.

It is estimated that over half of the trace metals carried in runoff waters are attached to sediments (Caltrans, 1996). Sources of these metals found at construction sites include galvanized metal, paint, and preserved wood. Nearly all metals can be toxic to plants, animals, and fish. In addition, metals can accumulate in the tissues of plants, animals, and fish and have the potential to contaminate drinking water.

Hydrocarbons and Other Wastes Found in Runoff Waters

Other pollutants found in runoff from construction sites include hydrocarbon compounds caused by leaks from heavy equipment, hydraulic line failures, hydrocarbon spills during refueling, inappropriate disposal of drained fluids, and so forth. When runoff occurs, these hydrocarbons can wash into the water, harming plant and animal life.

Other wastes from construction sites that can lead to unsightly and polluted water include:

• Wash water from concrete mixers

• Paints and painting equipment
• Wastes from cleaning of vehicles and equipment
• Wastes from trees and shrubs removed during land clearing
• Wood and paper from building product packaging
• Food containers, such as paper, aluminum, and metal cans
• Sanitary wastes

The Importance of Vegetation

The best method for minimizing the discharge of sediment from a construction site is to keep a good vegetative cover on the soil. When sufficient plant cover exists, raindrops or runoff waters can only cause minimal erosion of the soil. An extensive root system will also bind soil together to resist erosion by flowing water.

Identifying the Sources

Construction activities will result in the disturbance of existing plants, soil, and rocks. Problems often occur when soil is stockpiled, used to fill holes or low areas, or removed from the area.

Other problems might occur from careless handling of construction materials or fuels on-site, since nutrients, trace metals, and hydrocarbons can seep into the ground from these sources. In addition, when storm events occur runoff may carry contaminated soils away from the construction site to become a source of downstream pollution. Less erosion means less sediment in runoff waters. Therefore, good erosion control means good sediment control. Reducing the amount of sediment in runoff water means there will be fewer pollutants carried downstream from their source.

Wetlands and fish habitats might require considerable time to recover following construction projects. To allow for recovery, activities should include establishing vegetation on disturbed areas to reduce the sediment entering downstream waters during and after grading activities occur. Care should also be taken to avoid excessive application of chemicals that could find their way into runoff from the site. Once the flow of sediment and pollutants is reduced, spawning beds can recover and the danger of fish suffocation is reduced.

REGULATIONS AND STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS

On average, Florida receives 40- to 60-inches of rain each year, often in the form of torrential downpours that cause runoff carrying sediment, fertilizers, pesticides, oil, heavy metals, bacteria, and other contaminants which enter our surface waters. To minimize these adverse impacts, a Florida Stormwater or Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) must be obtained from the applicable WMD or FDEP office before construction begins. ERPs integrate stormwater quantity and quality, as well as wetland protection requirements into a single permit. They regulate activities such as dredging and filling-in wetlands, construction of stormwater facilities, stormwater treatment systems, construction of dams or reservoirs, and other activities affecting state waters. Each WMD has an operating agreement with FDEP about which agency will process ERPs for particular projects, based on the type of land use.

Specific requirements for stormwater management, including erosion and sediment control during grading, flood control, and stormwater treatment can be found in the specific ERP regulations applicable within the appropriate WMD. These requirements include specific design criteria for various types of stormwater treatment practices. For additional details about these regulations, refer to http://www.dep.state.fl.us/water/wetlands/erp/index.htm or http://flwaterpermits.com.

In December 2000, the EPA authorized FDEP to implement the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Stormwater Program within the State of Florida, with the exception of Indian Nation lands. Mandated by the United States Congress under the Clean Water Act, the NPDES Stormwater Program is a national program for addressing many urban stormwater discharges, which may adversely impact water quality.

The NPDES Stormwater Program is completely separate from the State’s stormwater/environmental resource permitting programs found under Part IV, Chapter 373 of the Florida Statutes. The NPDES Stormwater Program does not establish additional regulations for the construction/design features for retention areas, detention ponds, swales and other stormwater management systems. Additionally, the permit required under FDEPs NPDES Stormwater permitting program is also separate from any local government’s stormwater discharge permit for construction activity.

The sources of stormwater discharges regulated under the NPDES Stormwater Program include the following three categories:

• Construction Activities
• Industrial Activities
• Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems

This section will only address construction activities. Florida’s WMDs may have more stringent criteria than what is being presented in this manual and should be consulted for their requirements.

Construction Activities

Stormwater runoff from construction activities can have a significant impact on water quality by contributing sediment and other pollutants to water bodies. The NPDES Stormwater Program regulates construction activities that disturb one or more acres of land and discharge stormwater to surface waters of the State or into a municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4).

If a project is less than one acre, but part of a larger common plan of development or sale that will ultimately disturb one or more acres, permit coverage is also required. A larger common plan or development or sale is a contiguous area where multiple separate and distinct construction activities may be taking place at different times on different schedules. An example of this condition is the development of a housing subdivision.

When a developer buys a 20-acre parcel and builds roads, installs water/sewer with the intention of constructing homes or other structures in the future, this would be considered a larger common plan or development or sale. If the land is parceled off or sold, and construction occurs on plots that are less than one acre by separate, independent builders, this activity still would be subject to NPDES stormwater permitting requirements regardless of the size of any of the individually owned lots.

Identification of Operators

The Generic Permit for Stormwater Discharge from Large and Small Construction Activities

(CGP), (FDEP Document 62-621.300(4)(a), effective May 2003) defines “operator” as:

The operator is ultimately responsible for obtaining permit coverage and implementing appropriate pollution prevention techniques to minimize erosion and sedimentation from stormwater discharges during grading.

For construction projects where the operator changes, the new operator should obtain permit coverage at least two (2) days before assuming control of the project. The previous operator should file a NPDES Stormwater Notice of Termination (FDEP Form 62-621.300(6)) to terminate coverage under the CGP. The previous operator must meet the conditions to terminate coverage in accordance with Part VIII of the CGP.

CGP Requirements

The following is a brief summary of major CGP requirements. For a complete summary of the regulatory requirements always refer to the CGP.

• A copy of the NOI or the acknowledgement letter from the Notices Center confirming coverage under the CGP must be posted at the construction site in a prominent place for public viewing (such as alongside the building permit).
• Inspections
• Termination of Coverage
• Retention of Records

To obtain NPDES stormwater permit coverage, a regulated construction operator must complete the following steps:

Understand the CGP and Develop a SWPPP

1)      Obtain and carefully read the CGP (The CGP is available online at: http://www.dep.state.fl.us/water/stormwater/npdes/construction3.htm)

2)      Develop a site specific Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). See Section II of this manual for additional information on how to develop a SWPPP.

Complete an NOI Application

1)      Complete in its entirety the application or Notice of Intent (NOI) form (FDEP Form 62- 621.300(4)(b)).

2)      Submit the NOI with the appropriate processing fee to the NPDES Stormwater Notices Center.

1. Rule 62-4.050(4) (d), Florida Administrative Code, requires the processing fee*.

*The fee is subject to change so check the Rule to determine the appropriate fee when applying. Chapter 62-4 is available online at: http://www.dep.state.fl.us/legal/Rules/mainrulelist.htm or http://fac.dos.state.fl.us/

1. b.             Do notsend plans or a copy of your SWPPP when applying for permit coverage. Only the NOI and appropriate fee is required. If the project site is inspected, the regulatory agency or designated representative will review the contents of the SWPPP at the time of the inspection. (The regulatory agency may also at any time request that the SWPPP be submitted for review.)
2. c.       For projects that discharge stormwater to a MS4, a copy of the NOI must also be submitted to the operator of the MS4.

Operators seeking coverage under the CGP must apply for permit coverage at least two (2) days prior to the commencement of construction. Permit coverage under the CGP is effective two (2) days after the date of submittal of a complete NOI and appropriate fee. Submittal is interpreted as “postmarked.”  All NOIs should be mailed to:

Florida Department of Environmental Protection NPDES Stormwater Notices Center, MS#2510 Tallahassee, FL 32399

The NPDES Stormwater Notices Center will send an acknowledgement letter to the operator after reviewing and processing your complete NOI and fee. The acknowledgment or confirmation letter identifies the permit or project number for your activity and indicates the issuance and expiration date for the CGP. Permit coverage under the CGP is limited to a term of five (5) years. If construction activity extends beyond a period of five (5) years, the operator will be required to reapply for permit coverage.

Inspections

One of the key components of the CGP is the requirement for a qualified inspector to inspect all discharge points, disturbed areas, material storage areas, structural controls and construction entrances/exits at least once every seven (7) days and after every 0.50-inch or greater storm event. Major observations and incidents of non-compliance should be recorded in the inspection report, as well as corrective actions and maintenance.

Unless advised otherwise, maintenance must occur within seven (7) calendar days of the inspection. These inspections must be documented and signed by a qualified inspector as defined by the CGP. The report shall contain a certification that the facility is in compliance with the SWPPP and the CGP when the reports do not identify any incidents of non-compliance.

Notice of Termination (NOT)

Upon completion of the project and final stabilization, the permittee needs to submit a signed NOT application to the NPDES Stormwater Notices Center and the MS4. Final stabilization is defined within the CGP as:

“All soil disturbing activities at the site have been completed, and that a uniform perennial vegetative cover with a density of at least 70% for all unpaved areas and areas not covered by permanent structures has been established or equivalent permanent stabilization measures have been employed.”

When the operator changes to relinquish control of a project to a new operator, A NOT also shall be filed at:

Retention of Records

NPDES Stormwater Section

Florida Department of Environmental Protection NPDES – stormwater@dep.state.fl.us www.dep.state.fl.us/water/stormwater/npdes/

The permittee needs to retain copies of the NOI, SWPPP, inspection reports, NOT, and any other supporting documentation for at least three (3) years from the date the site is finally stabilized.

General Comments

It is important to note that the permit required under FDEP’s NPDES Stormwater permitting program is separate from the Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) required under Part IV, Chapter 373, F.S., a stormwater discharge permit required under Chapter 62-25, FAC, or any local government’s stormwater discharge permit for construction activity.

The FDEP/WMD Environmental Resource Permitting Program benefits Florida by requiring the implementation of effective mitigation measures that will minimize stormwater pollution to Florida’s lakes and streams and protect wetlands (see http://www.flwaterpermits.com).

Designers need to identify within which of the five WMDs (seen at right) that their project is located to ensure all permits and environmental issues are properly addressed within their SWPPP. Also, it will be necessary to contact the appropriate WMD office for specific ERP and dewatering permit requirements.

I -8

SECTION II

DEVELOPING EFFECTIVE SWPPP’S AND E&SC DRAWINGS

Table of Contents

CONTENTS OF A SWPPP……………………………………………………………………………………………. 1

NARRATIVE REPORT……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 1

Designer Certification Requirement……………………………………………………………………………. 2

Contractor Certification Requirement………………………………………………………………………… 2

CALCULATIONS…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 3

EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DRAWINGS………………………………………………………………………………………. 3

RECORD REQUIREMENTS……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 5

SWPPP and E&SC Drawing Update Requirements……………………………………………………… 6

DEVELOPING EFFECTIVE E&SC DRAWINGS…………………………………………………………. 6

THE IMPORTANCE OF PERTINENT DATA…………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 7

Collecting Data……………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 7

Interpreting and Evaluating Data………………………………………………………………………………. 7

DEVELOPING EFFECTIVE E&SC DRAWINGS……………………………………………………………………………………………… 8

Title Sheet……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 8

Pre Grading Drawings……………………………………………………………………………………………… 9

During Grading Drawings………………………………………………………………………………………. 10

After Grading Drawings………………………………………………………………………………………….. 11

Typical Detail and Specification Sheets…………………………………………………………………….. 12

Miscellaneous Comments………………………………………………………………………………………… 12

E&SC Drawing Summary………………………………………………………………………………………… 12

CONTENTS OF A SWPPP

The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan and accompanying E&SC plans shall identify potential sources of pollution that may reasonably be expected to affect the quality of stormwater discharge associated with construction activity. In addition, the plan shall describe and ensure the implementation of BMPs, which will be used to reduce the pollutants in stormwater discharge associated with construction activity and to assure compliance with the terms and conditions of the permit. A thorough understanding of the plan is essential for proper implementation and maintenance.

The SWPPP must be developed before an NOI is filed to receive the Generic Permit for Stormwater Discharge from Large and Small Construction Activities (CGP) coverage and meet or exceed FDEP requirements. Also, beginning on the first day of construction activities, the SWPPP and E&SC drawings must be available at the location identified in the NOI (see http://www.dep.state.fl.us)

A copy of the NOI or Notice of Coverage from FDEP shall be posted at the construction site in a prominent place for viewing. The location of the SWPPP is identified in the NOI and may or may not necessarily be at the construction site.

A SWPPP will consist of a narrative (including any calculations), E&SC drawings, and record requirements. In addition, the CGP requires a certification statement to be signed by the operator. It is strongly recommended that the Designer also sign a certification to ensure accountability exists. The SWPPP shall be developed and implemented for each construction site covered by this permit and be prepared in accordance with good engineering and scientific practices.

Narrative Report

The narrative report provides general information on what is to be completed to ensure minimal environmental damage as a construction project is developed. It should briefly describe the overall strategy for erosion and sediment control, as well as summarize the aspects of the project that are important for erosion control on-site for the plan reviewer and project superintendent.

A site description shall be included in the narrative report and include at a minimum the following information about the site:

• Description of the construction activity
• Total area of the site and total disturbance area
• Intended sequence of land disturbing activities
• Description of the soils and an identification of those that are highly erodible
• Drainage area for each major discharge point
• Latitude and longitude of each major discharge point
• Names of receiving water(s)
• Description of proposed pollution control measures (i.e. BMPs) to be used
• General sequence during the construction process in which the measures will be installed
• Estimated start date, completion date and stabilization schedule

• If possible, an identification of the contractor or subcontractor responsible for the BMP implementation, inspection, and maintenance

Operator (Permittee) Certification Requirement

Designers must sign, stamp (if appropriate), and date the following certification statement as part of their SWPPP:

“I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted.  Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.”

Contractor Certification Requirement

All contractors and subcontractors identified in the SWPPP, or those selected at a later date, must sign and date the following certification statement before conducting land-disturbing activities on the site:

“I certify under penalty of law that I understand, and shall comply with, the terms and conditions of the State of Florida Generic Permit for Stormwater Discharge from Large and Small Construction Activities and this Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan prepared there under.”

Inspection and maintenance of structural (e.g. sediment control) and non-structural (e.g. erosion control) BMPs are important aspects of the CGP and must be addressed in the SWPPP. The narrative report should briefly describe procedures that will be followed to ensure the timely installation, inspection, and maintenance of existing vegetation, erosion and sediment controls, stormwater management practices, and other protective measures so they will remain in effective operating condition.

All points of discharge into any surface waters (including wetlands), disturbed areas, material storage areas, structural controls, and vehicle ingress/egress areas must be inspected and documented at least once a week and after each storm event of 0.50-inches or greater. Unless advised otherwise, deficiencies will be corrected within seven (7) calendar days after being noted in the inspection report.

The CGP also requires that other potential pollutants be addressed in the SWPPP. Some of the items to consider may include paints, herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers, fuel, construction debris, chemicals, litter, and sanitary waste. The SWPPP will need to identify the storage areas, means of minimizing exposure to stormwater, proper disposal, as well as spill prevention and response measures.

The permit does not authorize the discharge of solid materials to surface waters of the State or an MS4; however, some non-stormwater discharges are allowable under the CGP if they meet conditions outlined in the CGP.

Calculations

This section of the SWPPP (usually an appendix) will contain information and calculations used in completing the design and illustration of BMPs found in the E&SC drawing. Examples include (but are not limited to) the following:

• Sizing of sediment containment systems (SCSs)
• Sizing of slope drains
  • Shear stress and velocity values for drainage channel Rolled Erosion Control Products (RECPs)
  • Seed mixture and application rates
  • Application rates of soil amendments, herbicides, pesticides and fertilizers
  • Flood flow evaluations at critical design points

Erosion and Sediment Control Drawings

The site plan or E&SC drawing is a key component of the SWPPP and must be developed for the contractor in a manner that meets federal, state and local environmental concerns. It has been found that contractors implement components of E&SC drawings more effectively when definitive legend symbols, informative leader notes, and meaningful shading appear throughout the drawings. While use of standard symbols denoting erosion and sediment control BMP measures are acceptable, they can be confusing to contractors if not used prudently and conservatively.

At a minimum, E&SC drawings will depict the following:

• Pre- and post-development drainage patterns
• Critical areas (e.g. highly erodible soils, wetlands, major discharge points, etc.)
• Structural and nonstructural controls
• Locations where offsite flows enter the site
• Discharge locations
• Existing vegetation and limits of clearing
  • Erosion and sediment control measures (include proposed sediment basins) and proposed locations
  • Proposed post-construction stormwater management measures
  • Off-site soil tracking prevention devices

Land disturbance contractors have the task of “molding” existing terrain into a final product for their client. At the same time, they have to complete their construction activities in a manner that meets FDEP, EPA, and other regulatory agency requirements for protecting waters of the United States. Therefore, it is recommended that Designers include the following when developing E&SC drawings:

• A Title Sheet that provides general information about the site including a general location map with sufficient detail to identify the construction site location and waters of the United States within one mile of the site. Also included should be a preliminary schedule for implementation of sediment and erosion control BMPs.

• Pre Grading drawings that illustrate existing site conditions and identify major discharge points, names of the receiving water(s) for each point, and show where to install structural (i.e. sediment control) measures before construction activities begin.
• During Grading drawings that illustrate what happens while land modifications activities occur. These sets of drawings evolve from project grading plans and must demonstrate the implementation of structural (i.e. sediment control) methods while major grading activities occur. In addition, references to non-structural (i.e. erosion control) BMPs found on After Grading drawings are to occur.
  • After Grading drawings that illustrate the implementation of sediment and erosion control measures after grading activities are completed. It is on this set of plans where non-structural measures are depicted that are to be implemented while construction activities occur.
  • Typical Detail and Specification drawings that provide the contractor with visual concepts of what is to be installed to reduce sediment from leaving a construction site as well as the type of erosion control methods that are to be used.

Designers may find that combining Pre- and During Grading drawings is feasible and may be acceptable to regulatory agencies. However, except perhaps for very small projects, combining all three construction plans into a single drawing is discouraged because of legibility.

Construction details, often in large-scale drawings, provide key dimensions and spatial information that will not fit on the E&SC drawing or site map. Other important information also should be provided such as specifications for planting seed, mulching, sediment barriers, erosion control materials, installation procedures, inspection requirements, and maintenance instructions. Detailed information and explanation about construction site BMPs can also be found in FDEP’s manual at http://www.dep.state.fl.us/water/nonpoint/ero_man.htm.

In addition to the above, designers will include within the E&SC drawings, guidelines for development of concrete washout areas and how storage of hazardous waste materials will occur. Criteria for concrete washout areas may include (but is not limited to) the following items:

• Shallow excavations lined with a material to prevent infiltration of washout material
• A soil tracking prevention device (see Section V) at the access point
• Signs throughout the construction site identifying the location
• Development of a containment structure
• Maintenance and termination plan

Designers should be innovative and consider other alternatives such as portable containment units, using washout material as part of driveways, and so forth.

Criteria for storage of hazardous waste material (e.g. petroleum products, pesticides, or paints, etc.) are more stringent and may include (but not be limited to) the following items:

• Development of temporary containment facilities that are away from water bodies and include sufficient spill containment areas and impervious surfaces
• Maintenance of temporary containment facilities against rainfall and spills
• Proper drum storage
• Location of where cleaning of paint related equipment is to occur

• Refueling stations
• Labeling waste containers
• Disposal procedures
• Procedures for reporting spills

For those having expertise on sediment and erosion control methods, this Designer manual provides summary information and illustrations of BMPs commonly found on land development, linear, and vertical/big box construction sites. As a summary, the remaining sections of this manual include the following:

• Section III provides information and drawings about erosion control methods and includes the following topics:

Ö    Runoff control structures such as diversion dikes, slope drains, and channel check structures

Ö    Vegetation topics such as staging, filter strips, and seeding requirements

Ö    Importance of mulches, soil binders

Ö    Selecting and installing RECPs on hillsides and in drainage channels

• Section IV discusses what is needed for the design of SCSs (a.k.a. sediment ponds, basins, and traps) and includes:

Ö    Criteria for containment of design size suspended particles

Ö    How to increase the efficiency of SCSs

Ö    Criteria for development of pre-sedimentation (a.k.a. forebay) basins

• Section V presents information on, and limitations of, commonly found sediment control BMPs that remove limited amounts of sediment from runoff waters. Specific topics include:

Ö    Uses of silt fence barriers

Ö    Information on using check structures and wattles

Ö    Methods for reducing sediment discharging into area (a.k.a. catch basin) drains

Ö    Methods for reducing sediment discharging into curb inlet drains

Designers need to remember that they are developing E&SC drawings for contractors to implement. In addition, reviewers, inspectors, and contractors must remember that E&SC drawings are only a “first appraisal” as to what is needed for reducing sediment in runoff waters and minimizing erosion. Consequently, Designers need to clearly indicate throughout the SWPPP and E&SC drawings, that these documents will require updating and modification while construction activities occur.

Record Requirements

The last part of a SWPPP involves keeping good inspection records. Record keeping is one of the most critical components of SWPPP requirements. Consequently, FDEP (and EPA) expects the contractor to complete the necessary record keeping tasks in a regular and expedient manner while construction activities are occurring.

1. Contractors must record the following dates:

a)      When major grading activities occur

b)      When construction activities temporarily or permanently cease on a portion of the site

c)      When stabilization (i.e. erosion control) measures begin

1. Contractors are to provide qualified inspectors who have knowledge and experience in the principles and practice of sediment and erosion control and can complete project site inspections:

a)      At least once every seven (7) days

b)      Within 24 hours after the end of a storm event of 0.50-inches or more

1. Contractors are encouraged to provide a Designer responsible for evaluating and inspecting the construction site at least once every 30 days while activities are occurring. This individual will be responsible for developing and signing their inspection report upon completion of site visits.

Reports for each inspection are to be part of the SWPPP records while construction activities occur and are to include certification about compliance and non-compliance issues found. In addition, those that have signed the NOI application are to retain reports for at least three (3) years from the date permit coverage expires or terminates. Appendix IV contains suggested inspection forms.

SWPPP and E&SC Drawing Update Requirements

The SWPPP is a dynamic document containing a set of sediment and erosion control drawings that provide a first appraisal of where to install BMPs on construction sites. Consequently, Designers need to clearly indicate in the SWPPP and accompanying E&SC drawings that they must be revised within seven calendar days following an inspection when additions and/or modifications to BMPs are necessary to correct observed problems. Revisions should occur:

• Whenever a change in the design, construction, operation, or maintenance at the construction site has a significant effect on the discharge of pollutants to the waters of the United States not previously addressed in the document.
• Whenever discharges are causing water quality “exceedance” (an EPA term) or the BMPs are ineffective (to an extent practical) in minimizing pollutants in stormwater discharging from the construction site.

It is expected that the operator’s inspectors and Designers will work together to ensure updates occur in a timely manner.

DEVELOPING EFFECTIVE E&SCDRAWINGS

There are many ways to develop E&SC drawings, all of which require Designers to address the following questions:

1. For WHOM is the plan being written?

Drawings must be readable, practical, and easily understood for use by contractors.

1. WHO is going to develop the plans?

Designers must have the skills and qualifications to understand what is required for effective sediment and erosion control.

1. HOW will the plan be implemented?

Sufficient guidelines and illustrations must appear on the plans to ensure contractors doing land disturbance activities understand what BMPs to install, inspect, and maintain for Pre-, During, and After Grading conditions.

1. WHEN will the plan be implemented and inspected?

Plans must contain sufficient information to demonstrate when installation of BMPs should occur and provide guidelines for their inspection and maintenance.

1. WHERE will BMPs be installed?

All E&SC drawings must identify to contractors those approximate locations where installation of BMPs is to occur while land disturbance activities are occurring.

1. WHY are plans being developed?

Designers must understand that they are developing plans so that contractors will be able to protect the environment while construction activities occur. In addition, the E&SC drawings need to demonstrate competency to regulatory personnel reviewing the plans.

1. WHAT has been developed?

Designers, contractors, and regulatory personnel must understand that E&SC drawings only provide a conceptual illustration as to how to reduce sediment in runoff waters and minimize erosion. Changes to the E&SC drawings must occur during the construction process.

The Importance of Pertinent Data

Locating and reviewing data are essential for understanding what is required for effective control of sediment and erosion and developing an effective E&SC drawing. Consequently, Designers are expected to collect, interpret, and evaluate data about the construction site.

Collecting Data

Regulatory agencies expect that E&SC drawings reflect a Designer’s expertise and professional skills by demonstrating that data collected includes at least the following items:

• Climate and rainfall data
• Soils data
• Existing and new vegetation requirements
• Location of critical areas
• Potential water quality problems and how they will be addressed
• Existing drainage channels
• Hydrologic characteristics of the site
  • Topographical mapping Interpreting and Evaluating Data

Development of effective E&SC drawings requires Designers to understand runoff flow patterns,

soil erodibility, vegetation establishment requirements, and potential impacts to downstream properties. Thus, it is important that identification of the following hydrologic characteristics for contributing drainage basins occur:

1. Drainage divides within the construction site boundaries
2. Historic and developed flow patterns
3. Identification of offsite drainage conditions that may impact the project site
4. Major basin discharge points

1. Existing natural drainage ways

In addition to the above, it is suggested that volume and peak flood flows for 2-year, 24-hour storm events also be provided so that proper design of SCSs can occur.

Another essential part of an effective E&SC drawing is identifying “critical” areas, including (but not limited to):

1. Highly erodible lands within the project area
2. Wetlands and riparian areas
3. Threatened or endangered wildlife and plants
4. Known contaminated sites (e.g. fuel storage facilities, waste stations, etc.)
5. Historic sites
6. Fishery and spawning streams
7. Waters impaired by pollutants

Evaluating soils and existing vegetation must occur to develop historic data for comparison with final reclamation of the site. When possible, Designers need to assess the following parameters before construction activities begin:

• Topsoil and subsoil materials nutrient levels
• Location of highly erodible soils
• Existing vegetative species identification (e.g. grasses, forbs, shrubs, and trees)
• Vegetative re-establishment criteria

Developing Effective E&SC Drawings

Once construction site data and information is interpreted and evaluated, results must become part of practical and realistic plans. Readers of this manual are encouraged to review examples of E&SC drawings found in Appendix V for linear and vertical/box projects.

Title Sheet

As part of the sediment and erosion control drawings, a title sheet shall be prepared that illustrates at least the following general information about the construction site:

1. Project Name,
2. One quarter Section, Township, Range
3. Project location illustrated on a USGS quadrangle map (scale of 1” = 2,000’ or smaller)
4. Contractor commitments along with accompanying signature
5. Preliminary schedule of activities
6. Index to the sheets
7. Signed and stamped (if appropriate) by a designer who is acceptable to the reviewing agency

Located within Appendix IV is a template for developing a preliminary schedule of activities that Designers may find to be helpful. Contractors need to adhere to the intent of a preliminary schedule since it provides guidelines for regulatory agencies to complete their inspections.

Pre Grading Drawings

Perhaps the most important set of drawings are those that clearly identify to contractors what to install beforemajor construction activities begin. These “Pre Grading” drawings must illustrate what and where to initially install sediment control measures that ensure minimal runoff impacts to adjacent properties or water bodies when land disturbance activities begin. More than one drawing may be needed.

Pre Grading drawings shall contain detailed drawings using an adequate scale that clearly illustrate the project site as well as include a north arrow, legend, date, elevation datum, and so forth. In addition, each Pre Grading drawing shall include at least the following information:

1. Project boundaries.
   1. Existing (do not include proposed) contours throughout, and at least 50 feet outside the perimeter of, the project site. Suggested contour intervals are 0.5- to 2-feet apart, but others may be necessary to ensure clarity of the plan.
   2. Existing topographic features (streams, ponds, wetlands, roads, existing drainage channels, existing buildings, where offsite flows enter the property, and so forth) throughout, and at least 50 feet outside the perimeter of, the project site.
   3. Existing types of vegetation throughout, and at least 50 feet outside the perimeter of, the project site.
   4. Existing drainage basins and flow arrows illustrating runoff patterns within the project site.
   5. Identifying different disturbance phases of the project site.
   6. Location of sensitive areas and (if appropriate) existing problems within the project site.
      1. Identifying approximate locations of where to install structural (i.e. sediment control) BMPs before construction activities begin. For some agencies, it may be necessary to illustrate “Owners Pay Item Structure” for the BMPs (see Appendix V).
      2. Minimum requirements for inspection and maintenance of BMPs.

One of the important tasks to complete with pre grading drawings is for designers to identify where water flows through the project and where critical discharge points exist. It is at these locations that significant flows can enter a water body and carry sediment onto downstream locations. As indicated earlier, latitude and longitude values are necessary for critical discharge points. The next (i.e. during grading) drawings must illustrate how discharges at the critical discharge points are addressed.

Notice that the Pre grading drawings illustrate only existing land contours. By not combining existing and future contours, the contractor can properly assess the site for selecting and implementing sediment control BMPs. Final land contours will be illustrated on After Grading drawings, and may be required for During Grading drawings.

The E&SC drawings need numerous notes and “leaders” to inform contractors as to what is expected for minimizing impacts to the environment while construction activities occur (see example in Appendix V). Also, it is important to identify when part of a site is not to be immediately disturbed, illustration of sediment control measures to install are still shown.

However, the contractor needs only to install and maintain those BMPs illustrated for lands where immediate disturbance activities occur.

Lastly, Designers, contractors, and regulatory agency personnel must understand that items identified on Pre Grading drawings are only a preliminary assessment of what may be required. Modifications to the drawings will be necessary while construction activities occur. Finally, Designers are encouraged to explore relevant updates with the contractor and regulatory agencies.

During Grading Drawings

The primary goal of any E&SC drawing while construction activities are occurring is to have clear illustrations for the contractor to install and maintain BMPs that ensure optimal treatment of concentrated runoff waters as land disturbance activities happen. This means that the Designers must clearly illustrate on their drawings what methods to install at critical discharge points to treat runoff while major land disturbance activities occur.

Grading of the land requires many different tasks to be completed simultaneously. In addition to major land disturbance, installation of storm sewer systems, development and paving of roads, grading land for building pads, and numerous other construction activities occur. It is for this reason that designers need to develop easy-to-read and effective During Grading drawings for the contractor of sediment and erosion control measures to implement, inspect, and maintain.

Like Pre Grading plans, more than one drawing may be required.

During Grading plans shall contain detailed drawings using the same scale as pre grading plans to clearly illustrate the project site as well as include a north arrow, legend, date, elevation datum, and so forth. In addition, During Grading drawings shall include at least the following information:

1. Project boundaries and limits of soil disturbance.
   1. Existing (try not to include proposed, if feasible) contours throughout, and at least 50 feet outside the perimeter of, the project site. Suggested contour intervals are 0.5- to 2-feet apart, but others may be necessary to ensure clarity of the plan.
   2. Boundaries for undisturbed riparian buffer strips.
   3. Extent of construction lines within which major land disturbance activities are to occur along with historic flow arrows.
   4. Outline of the project footprint that illustrates boundaries, roads, layout, and so forth.
      1. Identifying approximate locations of where to install structural (i.e., sediment control) BMPs while construction activities occur. For some agencies, it may be necessary to illustrate “Owners Pay Item Structure” for the BMPs (see Appendix V).
      2. Identifying approximate locations of where to install nonstructural (i.e., erosion control) BMPs while construction activities are occurring (reference to After Grading drawings may be necessary). For some agencies, it may be necessary to illustrate “Owners Pay Item Structure” for the BMPs (see Appendix V).
      3. Notes that indicate the contractor’s responsibility for locating and reporting where (as well as where not) topsoil stockpiles, staging areas, equipment storage, refueling/maintenance areas, and disposal areas are to exist.
      4. Minimum requirements for inspection and maintenance of BMPs.

During Grading drawings illustrate to the contractor critical “containment” contours to ensure that optimal treatment of runoff from the disturbed lands will occur. Essential to this process is

to illustrate on During Grading drawings what BMPs to install at critical discharge points. This means Designers must develop their drawings so that contractors can clearly envision the BMPs to install for major grading activities (see example in Appendix V).

As with Pre Grading drawings, Designers, contractors, and regulatory agency personnel must understand that During Grading drawings are only a preliminary assessment of what BMPs may be required. Modifications to the drawings may be necessary while construction activities occur and Designers are encouraged to explore relevant updates with the contractor and regulatory agencies.

After Grading Drawings

Contractors also need a set of drawings that clearly illustrate how the site will appear After Grading activities are completed. Special consideration may be needed for each of the four (i.e., large land, linear, vertical, and big box) different types of projects. These drawings will also need instructions on removing unnecessary sediment control measures (see example in Appendix V).

One of the main purposes of After Grading drawings is to illustrate where to install erosion control practices for final stabilization of the disturbed lands. Included on these plans are such items as installing sod, planting seed, applying mulch, swale protection, hillside BMPs, and so forth. Another important aspect of After Grading drawings is to clearly illustrate what must occur while building activities happen. As with the previous drawings discussed, more than one drawing may be required.

After Grading plans shall contain detailed drawings using the same scale as Pre Grading plans. In addition, all plans must clearly illustrate the project site as well as include a north arrow, legend, date, elevation datum, and so forth. Finally, After Grading drawings shall include at least the following information:

1. Project boundaries and adjacent lands.
   1. Proposed (do not include existing unless topography does not change) contours throughout, and those existing at least 50 feet outside the perimeter of, the project site. Suggested contour intervals are 0.5- to 2-feet apart, but others may be necessary to ensure clarity of the plan.
   2. Developed basin drainage boundaries and accompanying flow arrows.
   3. Boundaries for undisturbed riparian buffer strips.
   4. Outline of the project footprint that illustrates lot boundaries, roads, layout, and so forth.
      1. Illustrations of where re-establishment of permanent vegetation on disturbed lands are to occur. For some agencies, it may be necessary to illustrate “Owners Pay Item Structure” for the BMPs (see Appendix V).
      2. Illustrations where installations of other erosion control measures (e.g., riprap, RECPs, etc.) are to occur. For some agencies, it may be necessary to illustrate “Owners Pay Item Structure” for the BMPs (see Appendix V).
      3. Instructions on removing unnecessary sediment control (e.g., silt fence barriers) BMPs once 70% vegetative cover and/or other stabilization measures exist.
      4. Minimum requirements for inspection and maintenance of erosion control BMPs.

When final contours of a site are not available, regulatory agencies may waive what is required in Item No. 2. When such a waiver is granted, spot elevations will be necessary to clearly illustrate high points, flow directions and so forth.

Lastly, Designers, contractors, and regulatory agency personnel must understand that items identified on After Grading drawings are only a preliminary assessment of what may be required. Modifications to the drawings may be necessary while construction activities occur and Designers are encouraged to explore relevant updates with the contractor and regulatory agencies.

Typical Detail and Specification Sheets

Contractors need to install, inspect, and maintain BMPs in a manner that will be effective in removing sediment from runoff waters and minimize erosion. Designers need to provide adequate information about the details so that the contractor can visualize what needs to be installed. This means keeping wording about BMPs on a specification sheet to a minimum. Instead, let the details provide basic information for the contractor about BMPs.

Appendix V illustrates an example of how details and specifications may appear. Do not clutter these sheets with meaningless information and material. Illustrate only those BMPs that are pertinent to the project and recommended to be installed on construction sites as shown on the E&SC drawings. However, do not limit the contractor from installing other BMPs when regulatory agencies and/or the designer give approval for their use and implementation.

Miscellaneous Comments

Perhaps the greatest fallacy that Designers and contractors have with designing and implementing a SWPPP and E&SC plan, respectively, lies with their over-reliance on sediment control BMPs. The only structural practice to effectively reduce sediment in runoff from construction sites is a properly designed SCS (a.k.a., sediment basin, pond, or trap) that treats a majority of site stormwater. Failure to minimize sediment leaving a construction site will be the norm when relying solely upon sediment barriers, such as silt fences or rock barriers, in front of inlets.

While ineffective sediment barriers may be the only alternative BMP to consider, they must be viewed as being only a temporary mitigation measure. Designers need to strategically place notes on their E&SC drawings that alert contractors to their obligation of implementing cost effective and practical erosion control practices while grading and construction activities occur. Examples of such practices might include (but not be limited to) applying sod, planting temporary or perennial grass seed, applying mulch and/or soil binder, installing inexpensive erosion control blankets, and so forth.

Finally, Designers need to impart the message that E&SC drawings are (at best) only an estimate of what needs to be done on the construction site. It is for this reason that contractors need to be aware that E&SC drawings are subject to additional, new and alternative BMPs when requested or approved by the Designer and/or regulatory agency.

E&SC Drawing Summary

Some of the more important items Designers need to consider when developing their E&SC drawings include:

• Remember that development of E&SC drawings are for the contractor.

• Research existing conditions of the site, including drainage patterns, inflow and outflow locations for runoff, soils, sensitive areas, and so forth.
• Use only existing contours on Pre- and (if feasible) During Grading drawings.
• Use only proposed contours and/or spot elevations on After Grading drawings.
• After Grading drawings may need to include sufficient information about the use of BMPs while building activities occur.
• Include sufficient notes and leaders about the BMPs.
• Provide accurate and complete detail drawings and simple specifications.
• Identify inspection and maintenance requirements.

II-13

This page intentionally left blank

SECTION III

EROSION CONTROL METHODS

Table of Contents

INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 1

USE OF VEGETATION……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 1

MAINTAINING ESTABLISHED VEGETATION……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 1

VEGETATIVE FILTER STRIPS………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 1

ESTABLISHING VEGETATION…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 2

Sod…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 2

Permanent Vegetation………………………………………………………………………………………………. 2

Temporary Vegetation………………………………………………………………………………………………. 2

Planting Seed…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 2

Pure Live Seed Rates vs. Bulk Rates…………………………………………………………………………… 3

Methods of Planting Seed………………………………………………………………………………………….. 3

Polymer Enhanced Soil Stabilization………………………………………………………………………….. 4

MULCHES……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 4

Dry Mulches……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 5

Compost Materials…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 5

Hydraulic Mulches…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 5

SOIL BINDERS……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 6

ROLLED EROSION CONTROL PRODUCTS……………………………………………………………… 6

RECPS FOR DISTURBED SLOPES………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 6

SOFT ARMORING RECPS FOR CONCENTRATED FLOWS………………………………………………………………………. 10

Small Drainage Channels RECPs…………………………………………………………………………….. 10

Selecting a RECP for Small Drainage Channels………………………………………………………… 10

RUNOFF CONTROL STRUCTURES…………………………………………………………………………. 18

DIVERSION DIKES AND CONVEYANCE CHANNELS………………………………………………………………………………… 18

SLOPE DRAINS FOR BASINS…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 19

SLOPE DRAINS FOR ROADS………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 22

CHANNEL CHECK STRUCTURES…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 27

Spacing of Check Structures…………………………………………………………………………………….. 27

EXAMPLES………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 34

CHANNEL RECP FOR A SPECIFIC FLOW…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 35

BASIN SLOPE DRAIN……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 37

ROADWAY SLOPE DRAIN…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 37

Summary Sheets for Erosion Control BMPs

Rolled Erosion Control Product for a Disturbed Slope…………………………………………………………. 8

Rolled Erosion Control Product for a Drainage Channel…………………………………………………….. 15

Slope Drain for Small Basins………………………………………………………………………………………….. 20

Slope Drain for Road Embankments………………………………………………………………………………… 23

Geosynthetic Barrier Check Structure………………………………………………………………………………. 30

Rock Barrier Check Structure…………………………………………………………………………………………. 32

Table of Figures

FIGURE III-1:    DISTURBED SLOPE RECP SELECTION GUIDE (ECTC, 2004)…………………………………… 7

FIGURE III-2:    ILLUSTRATION OF INSTALLING A RECP ON A DISTURBED SLOPE……………………………………….. 9

FIGURE III-3:    CHANNEL CROSS-SECTION EQUATIONS (NRCS, 1950)……………………………………….. 13

FIGURE III-4:    ILLUSTRATION OF INSTALLING A RECP IN A DRAINAGE CHANNEL…………………………………. 17

FIGURE III-5:    INSTALLING A SLOPE DRAIN ON A DISTURBED SLOPE………………………………………………………… 21

FIGURE III-6:    INSTALLING A SLOPE DRAIN FOR ROAD EMBANKMENTS………………………………………………….. 25

FIGURE III-7:    CONTAINMENT CHAMBER FOR A ROAD EMBANKMENT SLOPE DRAIN…………………………….. 26

FIGURE III-8:    PLACEMENT OF CHECK STRUCTURES FOR CHANNEL STABILITY………………………………………. 27

FIGURE III-9:    RECOMMENDED SPACING OF BARRIERS IN DRAINAGE CHANNELS WHEN INSTALLED AS

EROSION CONTROL MEASURES……………………………………………………………………………………………… 28

FIGURE III-10: GEOSYNTHETIC BARRIER CHECK STRUCTURE FOR SMALL DRAINAGE DITCHES…………… 31

FIGURE III-11: ROCK CHECK STRUCTURES IN SMALL DRAINAGE CHANNELS………………………………………….. 33

FIGURE III-12: ZONES FOR PRECIPITATION INTENSITY DURATION FREQUENCY CURVES AS DEVELOPED BY THE FDOT (2001)…………………………………………………………………. 39

FIGURE III-13: RAINFALL INTENSITY DURATION FREQUENCY CURVE FOR ZONE 1 (FDOT, 2001)…….. 40

FIGURE III-14: RAINFALL INTENSITY DURATION FREQUENCY CURVE FOR ZONE 2 (FDOT, 2001)…….. 41

FIGURE III-15: RAINFALL INTENSITY DURATION FREQUENCY CURVE FOR ZONE 3 (FDOT, 2001)…….. 42

FIGURE III-16: RAINFALL INTENSITY DURATION FREQUENCY CURVE FOR ZONE 4 (FDOT, 2001)…….. 43

FIGURE III-17: RAINFALL INTENSITY DURATION FREQUENCY CURVE FOR ZONE 5 (FDOT, 2001)…….. 44

FIGURE III-18: RAINFALL INTENSITY DURATION FREQUENCY CURVE FOR ZONE 6 (FDOT, 2001)…….. 45

FIGURE III-19: RAINFALL INTENSITY DURATION FREQUENCY CURVE FOR ZONE 7 (FDOT, 2001)…….. 46

FIGURE III-20: RAINFALL INTENSITY DURATION FREQUENCY CURVE FOR ZONE 8 (FDOT, 2001)…….. 47

FIGURE III-21: RAINFALL INTENSITY DURATION FREQUENCY CURVE FOR ZONE 9 (FDOT, 2001)…….. 48

FIGURE III-22: RAINFALL INTENSITY DURATION FREQUENCY CURVE FOR ZONE 10 (FDOT, 2001)…… 49

FIGURE III-23: RAINFALL INTENSITY DURATION FREQUENCY CURVE FOR ZONE 11 (FDOT, 2001)…… 50

TABLE III-1:     MANNING’S ROUGHNESS COEFFICIENTS FOR VARIOUS MATERIALS (FIFIELD, 2004)…. 12

TABLE III-2:     PERMISSIBLE SHEAR-STRESS VALUES AND VELOCITIES FOR VARIOUS MATERIALS (FIFIELD, 2004)…………………………………………………………………………. 14

TABLE III-3:     RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS FOR THE RATIONAL METHOD (FDOT, 1987)……………………… 38

Introduction

Sediment control practices remove some, but rarely all, particles suspended in runoff waters. It is for this reason that erosion control practices are an essential part of any E&SC plans to minimize the forces of raindrops, concentrated flows, and wind from detaching and transporting soil particles. Examples of erosion control include:

• Maintaining, establishing, and using vegetation
• Applying and maintaining mulches
• Applying soil tackifiers
• Diverting and controlling runoff waters

Good erosion control practices result in good sediment control, yet the opposite is not true. Thus, sediment control practices should always be considered as secondary (yet sometimes the only) treatments for construction sites. More importantly, as the effectiveness of erosion control practices increases, the need for sediment control will diminish. Hence, it is important for Designers to clearly identify to contractors through their E&SC drawings that stabilization of disturbed lands must occur as construction activities happen.

USE OF VEGETATION

The optimal erosion control practice is to maintain existing vegetation or when lands are disturbed, establish new vegetation. As with check dams, vegetation can serve two purposes, namely, capture sediment and minimize erosion. Additional information on coastal vegetation appears in Appendix I.

Maintaining Established Vegetation

One of the most effective methods for minimizing erosion is to only disturb areas immediately needed for construction. By “staging” land-disturbance activities, existing vegetation reduces the potential for sediment generation due to erosion of bare ground. Existing vegetation also provides “buffer strips” to remove suspended particles from sheet flows. This is important when construction activities occur near watercourses.

When possible, existing vegetated drainage channels should not be disturbed during initial land clearing stages of a project. Leave these drainage channels stabilized until the new drainage system is in place or until the earthwork phase of the project precludes their continued use and a temporary drainage system is established.

Vegetative Filter Strips

Vegetative Filter Strips (VFS) are examples of what can be done for sediment and erosion control. When flows pass over and through these strips, large suspended particles (e.g. sands and silts) settle within a short distance. Finer particles (e.g. clays) are carried the furthest before settling and may stay suspended if runoff velocity remains high.

The following provides a summary of VFS ability to reduce sediment in runoff waters:

• They can effectively remove sediment in runoff water when shallow or sheet flow conditions exist or ponding can occur. Some reduction of sediment may occur for concentrated flows.
• As sediment accumulates on the strips, they become less effective; however, with slow accumulations, grass re-growth may restore the filtering capacity.

• Larger diameter particles (sands and silts) are removed first. Small particles (e.g. clays) settle more slowly and may experience limited removal due to strip width and flow rates.

It is recommended that VFS have a minimum width of 25 feet. However, widths may be dependent upon site conditions and local regulatory requirements. Also, when Designers recommend this form of sediment control, they must clearly identify the need for continual maintenance of the strips.

Establishing Vegetation

The most efficient and economical method for controlling erosion and minimizing sediment yields is to establish a vegetative cover. Two common methods used in Florida are to place and establish sod on disturbed lands or plant seed.

Sod

Sod provides a quick and relatively inexpensive method for establishing vegetation, but can be very labor intensive. While sod planted on a disturbed slope provides nearly instantaneous vegetation establishment, it cannot be classified as a success within drainage channels until root establishment.

Permanent Vegetation

Designers may find that it is more economical and practical to establish vegetation by planting seed rather than using sod. Permanent vegetation usually requires a perennial grass or legume to be used. Whenever possible, Designers should specify plant species that are native to the local area. Permanent vegetation is recommended for:

1. Final graded or cleared areas where permanent vegetative cover is needed to stabilize the soil.
2. Slopes designated to be treated with erosion control blankets.
   1. Drainage channels or waterways designed to be protected with channel liners. Temporary Vegetation

Rapidly growing annuals and legumes are examples of temporary vegetation recommended for

disturbed lands that:

1. Will not be brought to final grade within seven (7) days or are likely to be re-disturbed.
2. Require seeding of cut and fill slopes under construction.
3. Require stabilization of soil storage areas and stockpiles.
4. Require stabilization of temporary dikes, dams, and sediment containment systems (SCSs).
   1. Require development of cover or nursery crops to assist with establishment of perennial grasses.

Examples of temporary vegetation include wheat, oats, barley, millet, and Sudan grass. Planting Seed

Advantages of planting seed to establish vegetation include:

• Low initial costs
• Reduction of expenses associated with sediment control
• Low labor requirements

• Ease of establishing vegetation in difficult areas Some disadvantages of planting seed are:
• The potential for erosion exists during the establishment stage
• The potential exists for the need to re-seed areas that fail
• Sufficient moisture conditions might not exist in a timely manner for germination of the seed

Seed selection may involve warm season, cool season, or a combination of both types of grasses. Usually, Florida will use warm season grasses that prefer warmer climatic and soil conditions to germinate. Cool season grasses germinate under cooler climatic and soil conditions.

Pure Live Seed Rates vs. Bulk Rates

Not all seeds applied on bare ground will germinate. Likewise, seed-harvesting techniques do not result in the capture of a single grass species. Thus, Designers should express seed specifications as pure live seed (PLS) rather than in only bulk rates. The following equation illustrates how to calculate the percentage of PLS in a seed mixture:

PLS (%) = [purity (%) × germination (%)]                             Equation 1

For example, if a specific seed is tagged as being 95% pure with an 81% germination rate, then the PLS = 95% × 81% = 77.0%.

Another way to specify seed mixture application rates is to use “bulk rates.” However, bulk rates do not provide information on seed purity and germination rates. When bulk-rate application rates are specified, they are calculated by the following equation:

Bulk Rate = PLS Rate ¸PLS Percentage                                Equation 2

Thus, if the PLS application rate of the above seed is 25.4 lbs./ac., then the bulk rate is 25.4

lbs./ac. ¸ 77.0% = 33.0 lbs./ac.

Additional information of selection of species and their application rates can be found from local Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS), regulatory agencies, and through seeding and mulching companies.

Methods of Planting Seed

One or more of the following methods can be used to plant seed:

1. Drill

a)      Seed is in direct contact with the soil

1. Broadcast

a)      Seed is on top of the ground.

b)      Raking is required to ensure seed is covered with soil.

c)      Application rate of seed is 2x to 4x times the drilled rate.

1. Hydraulic

a)      Seed is part of the slurry mixture applied on the soil.

b)      Application rate of seed is 5x to 6x the drilled rate.

Polymer Enhanced Soil Stabilization

If there is a requirement for increased erosion protection of disturbed slopes, Designers can consider adding polymers to the soil before applying soil binders, mulch, or erosion control blankets (see below).

Polymer additions can assist in the temporary or permanent establishment of grass by binding the seed, fertilizer, mulch, and soil together until germination happens. However, it is important that dosage rates be determined based upon site conditions (see Appendix III for more information).

Polymer dosage rates will vary with site-specific applications along with water and soil requirements. Using information found in Appendix III, the following rates might be applicable once site-specific conditions have been evaluated:

It is important that Designers work with professionals that are experienced in using polymers on construction sites. In this manner, potential environmental problems can be professionally addressed and problems avoided.

Mulches

Mulches are applied over the soil surface to reduce erosion from rainfall and wind. They are also used to aid the establishment of vegetation. Some typical uses for mulches include:

• Reduce soil erosion by wind and raindrop impact through temporary soil stabilization
• Providing cover until vegetation can be established
• Adding soil amendments such as organic matter and fertilizers
• Improving soil structures
  • Decrease the velocity of runoff over exposed soil areas, which increase the infiltration of water

Mulches can be used alone (usually temporarily) as a protective blanket on the soil. However, it is best to plant seed prior to any application of mulch. In this manner, vegetation will become available for erosion protection. Additional information on using mulches within coastal areas appears in Appendix I.

All mulches have limitations. For example, they are not suitable for areas with high tidal fluctuations, heavy wave action or where concentrated flows exist. In addition, some materials are susceptible to removal or disturbance by wind in exposed areas.

Successful use of dry or hydraulic mulches is dependent upon a rapid establishment of vegetation. Once vegetation becomes well established, and minimal amounts of weeds are present, erosion protection is provided by the vegetation root system and canopy cover.

Dry Mulches

Mulches can be classified as “dry” or “wet” products. Dry mulches usually consist of organic or inorganic materials, whereas wet mulches are applied with hydraulic equipment and also consist of organic materials.

Dry mulches can consist of:

• Certified noxious weed free straw or hay
• Compost materials, including wood or bark chips
• Rolled Erosion Control Products (RECPs)
• Rock

The standard application rate of straw/hay mulch is about 2.0 tons/acre with 80% to 100% ground coverage of material having minimum fiber lengths of 6.0- to 8.0-inches. Dry mulches must be held in place, usually by crimping, which forces, or punches, fibers into the ground by use of a weighted disk.

When straw/hay mulch fibers are short, anchoring material by crimping usually will not occur and removal by wind happens. A tackifier can overcome some wind removal problems by “gluing” the fibers together. However, strong winds could still remove sections of tackified dry mulches.

Compost Materials

A cost-effective method of developing dry mulch is to shred existing vegetation during clearing activities. This type of mulch, also known as compost material, can include:

• Dry straw/hay
• Wood chips, bark, cellulose fiber, or excelsior
• Other vegetative trimmings such as grass, shredded shrubs, and trees

An advantage of compost material is that vegetation removed during grading activities can be quickly ground or shredded and immediately applied onto disturbed lands. Thus, mulch is available during and after grading activities and may contain seeds of local grasses, bushes, and trees.

Unless there are some undesirable species in the compost material, it can often be applied adjacent to the soil/water interface. However, one possible limitation about compost is that it may contribute to water quality degradation. For example, it is possible that the introduction of organic (tannic) acids and dissolved organic carbon from decaying plant material to nearby coastal water bodies can occur.

Hydraulic Mulches

Hydraulic mulches have an advantage in that they can cover the ground but do not have to be crimped as with dry mulches. They are a mixture of shredded wood, paper, or corn stalk fiber and often include a stabilizing emulsion, tackifier, or polymer that can be applied with specialized equipment. However, without a “tackifier” to help bind the material, hydraulic mulches are susceptible to removal by precipitation and runoff.

The standard application rate of hydraulic mulches is 1.5 tons/acre. As with straw or hay, it is important that 80% to 100% ground coverage by material occurs.

Soil Binders

When dry mulch cannot be crimped, other methods to control erosion or hold fibers in place must be used. Soil binders and tackifiers have been developed to accomplish this task with examples including:

• Tackifying straw or hay mulches
• A component of hydraulic mulches and matrices
• Dust-control products

An excellent use of soil binders is to temporarily stabilize cut and fill areas. These low-cost erosion control products provide an effective, temporary method to reduce sediment leaving construction sites. However, soil binders should not be depended upon for more than three to six months as an erosion control practice. Also, they do not replace the need for permanent vegetation establishment by planting seed and mulching.

ROLLED EROSION CONTROL PRODUCTS

Rolled Erosion Control Products (RECPs) are manufactured mulch materials used to protect disturbed soils from erosion. They are also known as erosion control blankets or mats. All RECPs reduce the erosion process and create conditions to assist in establishing vegetation. They also allow for increased infiltration, conserve soil moisture, and help keep seed in place.

RECPs are composed of organic and/or inorganic materials. Organic materials are subject to both biological- and photo-degradation processes. Thus, they may degrade within three to 12 months. The inorganic materials may or may not be photodegradable and are less susceptible to the degradation processes.  Examples of RECP materials include the following:

In addition to the above materials, combinations of different material can be used (e.g. straw and coconut).

All RECPs require a method to keep the material in place. Usually, this consists of a polypropylene netting place on one or both sides of the material. Designers should evaluate the use of “net less” blankets or those RECPs using degradable netting that break down within specific project requirements.

RECPs for Disturbed Slopes

Significant reduction of erosion and good establishment of vegetation on disturbed slopes will occur by using properly installed RECPs. When establishing vegetation on disturbed slopes, organic RECPs are usually used. However, there may be situations where inorganic materials will be required.

Figure III-1 provides guidelines for selecting RECPs for disturbed slopes based upon criteria developed by the Erosion Control Technology Council (ECTC). Detailed information about the different types of products appears after Figure III-1.

While additional information is presented about the different types of RECP products, Designers are encouraged to obtain and review more detailed material found on the ECTC web site by accessing www.ectc.org.

Disturbed Slope (V:H)

Figure III-1: Disturbed Slope RECP Selection Guide (ECTC, 2004 and latest edition).

• Type 1 products are lightweight and typically are composed of single/double net straw or excelsior material, as well as jute.
• Type 2 products are more durable than Type 1 products and typically may be composed of single/double net straw or excelsior material, as well as jute.
• Type 3 products are more durable than either Type 1 or Type 2 products and typically may be composed of double net straw, straw-coconut, coconut, and excelsior, as well as jute.
• Type 4 products are expected to remain a viable erosion control material for long durations. .
  • Type 5 products are expected to have long-term functional longevity and are typically composed of polyolefin fibers, polypropylene, and nylon. Some products may be excelsior or a combination of polypropylene and straw-coconut/coconut material.

Some typical examples of the letter designation are:

1a, 2a, 3a – “netting only” used over Mulch (synthetic or natural ) with 3, 12, or 24 month life. 1b. 2b – “net less” Erosion Control Blanket – usually 3or 12 month life.

1c, 2c – Single Net Erosion Control Blanket or Open Weave Textile – 3 or 12 month life. 1d, 2d – Double Net Erosion Control Blanket – 3 or 12 month life.

3b – Double Net Erosion Control Blanket or Open Weave – 24 month life. 4 – Double Net Erosion Control Blanket or Open Weave – 36 month life.

5a, 5b, 5c – Permanent Erosion Control Blanket – 6, 8, or 10 lb/sf shear stress limits.

These designations may change with time and are subject to labeling practices, thus the users should consult the latest manufacturer and industrial standard publications when specifying a RECP. Additional information on installing disturbed slope RECPs appears in Figure III-2.

Rolled Erosion Control Product for a Disturbed Slope

WHAT IS ITS PURPOSE?

To protect disturbed slope surfaces against erosion due to rainfall or flowing water.

WHERE AND HOW IS IT COMMONLY USED?

WHEN SHOULD IT BE INSTALLED?

■         While construction activities are occurring.

■         After Grading activities are finished.

WHEN SHOULD IT NOT BE INSTALLED?

WHAT NEEDS TO BE INSPECTED?

WHAT MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES CAN BE EXPECTED?

NOTES

■         RECPs are composed of natural material including straw, straw-coconut, coconut (or coir), wood excelsior, and so forth. They must be held in place with netting sewn on both sides of the material.

■         Material must be placed in an uphill trench or adequately stapled.

■         Additional information on RECPs can be found at www.ectc.org.

Figure III-2: Illustration of Installing a RECP on a Disturbed Slope

Permission is given by HydroDynamics Incorporated to copy and reproduce this detail

Soft Armoring RECPs for Concentrated Flows

When water flows within roadside drainage ditches or into/out of culverts, intense hydraulic conditions exist that will cause erosion of stream embankments or channel beds. Similar hydraulic problems can occur with wave action on reservoir shorelines.

A common method used by Designers for protecting exposed soils against erosion is to install riprap, concrete structures, gabions or some other hard armoring. These methods have proven to be successful in controlling erosion of drainage channels and stream banks. However, “soft armoring” RECPs can provide an alternative to the traditional hard armors.

Small Drainage Channel RECPs

Vegetation usually provides the best method for reducing erosion in drainage channels. However, establishing vegetation in bare ground drainage channels is difficult when flows occur. Not only will the water remove seed and mulch, the kinetic energy of runoff causes erosion. Use of RECPs in channels may alleviate this problem.

Two types of RECPs can be used in drainage channels: Erosion Control Blankets (ECBs) and Turf Reinforcement Mats (TRMs). An ECB is the same organic material described previously for protecting hillsides against erosion. As with disturbed slope products, planting of seed must occur prior to installing the mat. The main purpose of an ECB is to provide temporary protection for grass seed to germinate and become established within the drainage channel. However, erosion problems may occur when the ECB deteriorates or is destroyed by high flows. It is for this reason that consideration needs to be given to using TRMs.

The EPA (1999) describes TRMs as being composed of interwoven layers of non-degradable geosynthetic materials such as polypropylene, nylon, and polyvinyl chloride netting, stitched together to form a three-dimensional matrix. A TRM can also consist of organic materials (e.g. coconut or straw) combined with geosynthetic products.

TRMs are thick and porous enough to allow for planting seed and filling with soil. In this manner, conditions will exist to allow for development of a root structure within the matrix. However, until the establishment of vegetation occurs, seed and soil may wash away due to runoff events.  Planting seed directly onto the channel overcomes this problem.

Figure III-4 illustrates installation procedures for ECBs and TRMs in drainage channels. Selecting a RECP for Small Drainage Channels

The most important item Designers need to consider in selecting an ECB or TRM is whether the

product will be able to withstand anticipated shear stress forces and flow velocities. The following provides information on how this is determined.

Selecting a RECP for a small drainage channel (e.g. roadside ditch) requires proper evaluation of shear stress and flow velocity so that either an ECB or TRM is selected. Velocity of flows in channels can be calculated by use of Manning’s Equation.

V = (1.486 ¸n) × R2/3 × S1/2                                                          Equation 3

where    V = Mean velocity of flow (ft./sec.) R = Hydraulic radius = A/WP (ft.) WP = Wetted perimeter (ft.)

S = Slope of the energy gradient (ft./ft.)

n = Roughness coefficient

Table III-1 provides roughness coefficients for different types of channel materials and Figure III-3 can be used to calculate channel parameters having different geometric shapes.

Flow velocity is not the only parameter to calculate when selecting an ECB or TRM for stabilizing small drainage channels. Shear stress must also be evaluated since it represents the frictional forces of water. Maximum shear stress occurs on the bottom material of a channel and is represented by:

tmax  = 62.4 × Y × S                                                          Equation 4

where    tmax  = Maximum shear stress (lbs./ft.²)

Y = Depth of water (ft.)

S = Slope of the energy gradient (ft./ft.)

Table III-2 provides permissible shear stress and flow velocities for different products and natural conditions.

Finally, Designers must remember that organic materials will biodegrade. Thus, selection of organic products must be based upon the maximum permitted shear stress values for final vegetative conditions rather than for the RECP material. However, it is important that any RECP selected be able to withstand anticipated shear stress and velocity until vegetation is established.

Additional information on selecting ECBs and TRMs in drainage channels can be found by accessing www.ectc.org or reviewing Fifield, 2004. An example of how to select a TRM or ECB appears in the example part of this section.

Table III-1: Manning’s Roughness Coefficients for Various Materials (Fifield, 2004)

a                     Chen and Cotton (1988)

b                     IECA (1995)

Figure III-3: Channel Cross-Section Equations (NRCS, 1950)

Table III-2:    Permissible Shear-Stress Values and Velocities for Various Materials Note: there is a shear value for each product. (Fifield, 2004)

a             Chen and Cotton (1988)                                             c              As reported by the manufacturer

b            IECA (1991, 1992, 1995)                                          NDG = No data given

Shear Diagram Information

Rolled Erosion Control Product for a Drainage Channel

WHAT IS ITS PURPOSE?

To protect a drainage channel against erosion due to flowing water.

WHERE AND HOW IS IT COMMONLY USED?

WHEN SHOULD IT BE INSTALLED?

■         While construction activities are occurring.

• After Grading activities are finished.

WHEN SHOULD IT NOT BE INSTALLED?

WHAT NEEDS TO BE INSPECTED?

WHAT MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES CAN BE EXPECTED?

NOTES

• Erosion Control Blankets (ECBs) are composed of natural material including straw, straw- coconut, coconut (or coir), wood excelsior, and so forth. They must be held in place with netting sewn on both sides of the material.
• One type of Turf Reinforcement Mats (TRMs) is composed of 100% polypropylene or nylon and held in place with netting sewn on both sides of the material.
• Another type of TRM is composed of straw-coconut or coconut matter reinforced with strands of polypropylene threads and all held in place with netting sewn on both sides of the material.
• Designers must complete shear stress and velocity calculations in selecting an ECB or TRM for drainage channels.
• Additional information about ECBs and TRMs can be found at www.ectc.org.

Figure III-4: Illustration of Installing a RECP in a Drainage Channel

Permission is given by HydroDynamics Incorporated to copy and reproduce this detail

RUNOFF CONTROL STRUCTURES

Construction activities usually result in the removal of vegetative cover and increases in impermeable surfaces, both of which lead to an increase in the peak flood flows, velocity, and volume of runoff. Increases in runoff volume and velocity lead to increased erosion (i.e. rills and gullies), sediment transport, and offsite delivery (sedimentation). These increases must be addressed when implementing sediment and erosion control measures.

Runoff-control measures are practices that mitigate the erosive and sediment transport forces of stormwater during and after grading activities. Some examples of runoff control measures include:

Diversion Dikes and Conveyance Channels

Diversion dikes will intercept and divert runoff waters in properly designed drainage conveyance channels. Essentially, diversion dikes can prevent runoff from flowing down a disturbed slope. Once these flows are reduced, rill and gully erosion will also be reduced.

Transporting runoff in drainage channels must be completed in a manner that minimizes erosion. Appropriate uses of diversion structures include the following:

• Diverting runoff from drainage areas away from disturbed areas and toward a stabilized outlet.
• Diverting sediment-laden runoff from a disturbed area into a sediment containment structure.
  • Using a dike to divert runoff waters to a conveyance channel in a manner that improves working conditions at the construction site and minimizes erosion.
  • Using a dike to ensure that sediment-laden stormwater will not leave the site without treatment.
    • Using methods that are sometimes preferable over barriers because they are more durable, less expensive, and require less maintenance when properly constructed.

Any channel created by a dike must have a sufficient grade that forces flows to a stabilized outlet. When the channel slope is less than or equal to 1.0%, stabilization might be required for soils that generate turbidity in runoff waters. Channel slopes greater than 1.0% must be stabilized to prevent degradation.

Sediment-laden waters must be diverted into a properly designed sediment containment system (SCS). In addition, runoff from undisturbed lands must discharge onto an outlet protection system.

As with all methods to control sediment and erosion, frequent inspections and maintenance must occur with diversion dikes and conveyance channels. The following guidelines should be followed when conducting inspections and maintenance:

• Inspect temporary facilities before and after significant runoff events and at least once per week during the rainy season.
• Channel linings, embankments, and channel beds must be continually inspected for erosion.
• Removal of debris and prompt repairs should always occur.

Slope Drains for Basins

Slope drains consist of flexible tubing, pipe, or other conduit extending from the top to the bottom of a cut or fill slope. Their purpose is to convey runoff waters across (and usually down) erodible lands in a manner that prevents erosion.

It is important that slope drains be sized, installed, and properly maintained since their failure could result in severe slope erosion. Entrance to the pipe must be well entrenched and stable. Increased inflows can be realized by installing flared end sections on the pipe. Finally, the pipe should extend beyond the toe of the slope or into an appropriately stabilized outlet. Figure III-5 illustrates the placement of these conveyance structures.

When selecting the diameter of a pipe for slope drains, Designers must be cognizant of contributing basin areas and the accompanying hydrologic conditions. For example, runoff from contributing bare ground basins of sandy soils will be different from what occurs with flows from bare ground clay soils.

When a containment berm has a height that is at least twice the pipe diameter of a slope drain (see Figure III-5), the pipe diameter can be calculated from:

D = 4.29 × Q^0.50 = 4.29 × (CiA) ^0.50                            Equation 5

Where D = Pipe diameter (inches)

Q = Peak flood flow for the design storm event (cfs)

C = Runoff coefficient

i = Rainfall intensity (inches/hour)

A = Contributing area (acres)

Located within the example part of this section is a table of runoff coefficients and Intensity Duration Frequency (IDF) curves for 11 FDOT regions throughout Florida.

Selections of the rainfall intensity should be based upon an average return period and the time of concentration for the site location, unless otherwise dictated by local regulations. The example at the end of this section illustrates the selection of a pipe diameter using the intensity of a 10- year return period.

Slope drain for Small Basins

WHAT IS ITS PURPOSE?

To protect hillside surfaces against erosion due to concentrated flows of runoff waters.

WHERE AND HOW IS IT COMMONLY USED?

WHEN SHOULD IT BE INSTALLED?

■         While construction activities are occurring.

■         After Grading activities are finished.

WHEN SHOULD IT NOT BE INSTALLED?

■         When contributory basins are large (usually greater than five acres).

WHAT NEEDS TO BE INSPECTED?

WHAT MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES CAN BE EXPECTED?

EQUATION USED TO CALCULATE PIPE DIAMETER:

D = 4.29 × Q^0.50 = 4.29 × (CiA) ^0.50

Where D = Pipe diameter (inches)

Q = Peak flood flow for the design storm event (cfs)

C = Runoff coefficient

i = Rainfall intensity (inches/hour)

A = Contributing area (acres)

Figure III-5: Installing a Slope Drain on a Disturbed Slope

Permission is given by HydroDynamics Incorporated to copy and reproduce this detail

Slope Drains for Roads

Protecting fill slopes from developing rills and gullies due to runoff waters off a road is similar to what is required for basins. Use of high flow diversion dikes is not always possible or advisable since erosion control of a channel is not always feasible in a practical manner.

However, placement of temporary slope drains along the top of a road embankment is feasible.

Spacing of temporary slope drains for roads are usually based upon pre-determined pipe diameters. What designers need to identify is the amount of runoff entering the pipe, which is dependent upon the width of the roadway. Figure III-6 and Figure III-7 illustrate placement of temporary roadway slope drains.

Assuming that a road has a rectangular shape and a containment berm along the side of the road has a height that is at least twice the pipe diameter of a slope drain, the spacing between each pipe can be calculated by:

L = (245.8 × D^2.5) ¸ (i × W)                                        Equation 6

Where L = Spacing between slope drains (feet)

D = Slope drain pipe diameter (inches)

i = rainfall intensity when the time of concentration is eight minutes (inches/hour)

W = Average width of the road that contribute runoff to the slope drain (feet)

Located at the end of the section are examples of how spacing of pipes is calculated for different pipe diameters, contributing road widths, and different frequency storm events.

This page intentionally left blank

Slope Drain for Road Embankments WHAT IS ITS PURPOSE?

Protection of road embankments from erosion where concentrated flows discharge off a road onto a fill slope.

WHERE AND HOW IS IT COMMONLY USED?

WHEN SHOULD IT BE INSTALLED?

■         While construction activities are occurring.

■         After Grading activities are finished.

WHEN SHOULD IT NOT BE INSTALLED?

■         Where no containment or diversion berm exists.

WHAT NEEDS TO BE INSPECTED?

WHAT MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES CAN BE EXPECTED?

EQUATION USED TO CALCULATE THE SPACING OF SLOPE DRAINS

L = 245.8 × D^2.5¸(i × W)

Where L = Spacing between slope drains (feet)

D = Slope drain pipe diameter (inches)

i = rainfall intensity when the time of concentration is eight minutes (inches/hour)

W = Average width of the road that contributes runoff to the slope drain (feet)

Figure III-6: Installing a Slope Drain for Road Embankments

Figure III-7: Containment Chamber for a Road Embankment Slope Drain

Permission is given by HydroDynamics Incorporated to copy and reproduce this detail

Channel Check Structures

Check structures in drainage channels are one of the more common methods found on construction projects. Many Designers associate the use of these structures as a way to control sediment. In reality, check structures in a drainage channel are examples of sediment containment systems and erosion control devices.

Only when properly installed will check structures in drainage channels create small SCSs behind the barriers and create erosion protection conditions. As flow velocity becomes sufficiently reduced (usually at the end of a significant runoff event), deposition of suspended particles will occur. Once sedimentation occurs, small “terraces” of deposit material are created behind the barrier (see Figure III-8) and a new channel slope is created that approaches 0.0%.

Thus, properly installed check structures in drainage channels for controlling sediment in drainage channels “evolve” into an erosion control method.

Spacing of Check Structures

If check structures are to reduce channel erosion until stabilization occurs, it is important that they be installed in a manner that allows for energy dispersion of the runoff. This is achieved by creating small stilling ponds behind the structures in a manner that prevents erosion of the channel bed (see Figure III-8).

Figure III-8: Placement of Check Structures for Channel Stability

As illustrated in Figure III-8, water can pond behind a properly installed barrier check structure. Thus, it is important that the containment structures be able to withstand the large hydraulic force stored water places on the material. It is for this reason, silt fence barriers are not recommended as drainage channel check structures unless they are properly installed and supported.

Otherwise, these barriers will fail.

Figure III-8 illustrates that placement of barriers along a drainage channel is very important if erosion is to be minimized. Spacing of barriers having different heights is illustrated in Figure III-9.

Figure III-9: Recommended Spacing of Barriers in Drainage Channels When Installed as Erosion Control Measures

This page intentionally left blank

Geosynthetic Barrier Check Structure

WHAT IS ITS PURPOSE?

Temporary containment structures to capture sediment and reduce runoff velocities in drainage channels while grading or construction activities occur.

WHERE AND HOW IS IT COMMONLY USED?

WHEN SHOULD IT BE INSTALLED?

■         While grading or construction activities are occurring.

WHEN SHOULD IT NOT BE INSTALLED?

■         After grading or construction activities are completed.

WHAT NEEDS TO BE INSPECTED?

WHAT MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES CAN BE EXPECTED?

Figure III-10: Geosynthetic Barrier Check Structure for Small Drainage Ditches

Permission is given by HydroDynamics Incorporated to copy and reproduce this detail

Rock Barrier Check Structure

WHAT IS ITS PURPOSE?

Temporary containment structures to capture sediment and reduce runoff velocities in drainage channels while grading or construction activities occur.

WHERE AND HOW IS IT COMMONLY USED?

WHEN SHOULD IT BE INSTALLED?

■         While grading or construction activities are occurring.

WHEN SHOULD IT NOT BE INSTALLED?

■         After grading or construction activities are completed and if they are to be the only method used for stabilizing drainage ditches.

WHAT NEEDS TO BE INSPECTED?

WHAT MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES CAN BE EXPECTED?

Figure III-11: Rock Check Structures in Small Drainage Channels

Permission is given by HydroDynamics Incorporated to copy and reproduce this detail

EXAMPLES

Channel RECP for a Specific Flow

What type of RECP is recommended for a triangular channel with 1V:5H side slopes and a channel grade of 1.25% to provide adequate erosion protection against a flow of 24 cfs and to assist with establishment of Type B vegetation?

This type of problem requires using the following equations:

V= (1.486 ¸n) × R2/3  × S1/2                     tmax  = 62.4 × Y × S                 Q = A × V

It is not possible to use any of the above equations to solve for a specific variable that ensures a correct solution. Instead, an iterative approach on specific variables has to occur.

The one parameter that Designers should know about for drainage channels is flow. In order to calculate flow in a drainage channel, it is necessary to determine cross-sectional area and flow velocity. This can only be accomplished by knowing the depth of flow in the channel when design flows (in this case, Q = 24.0 cfs) occurs.

Iteration No. 1

Assume an initial flow depth of 12 inches:

Ö     Decide upon a product to use. For this example, assume installation of an excelsior ECB is to occur, which (from Table III-1) has a roughness coefficient n = 0.035.

Ö     Calculate the cross-sectional area, wetted perimeter, and hydraulic radius of the trapezoidal channel for a flow depth d = 12 inches = 1.0 feet.

• From Figure III-3, the cross-sectional area of a triangular channel is calculated by:

A = Z·d² = 5 × (1.0) ² = 5.0 ft.²

• From Figure III-3, the wetted perimeter (WP) of a trapezoidal channel is calculated by:

WP = 2d × (Z² +1) ^1/2 = 2 × 1.0 × (5² + 1) ^1/2 = 10.2 ft.

The hydraulic radius is calculated by:

R = A ¸WP = 5.0 ¸10.2 = 0.49 ft.

Ö     Calculate the flow velocity using:

V = (1.486 ¸n) × R^2/3 × S^1/2 = (1.486 ¸ 0.035) × (0.49) ^2/3 × (0.0125) ^1/2 = 2.97 ft./sec.

Ö     Calculate the flow rate using:

Q = A × V = 5.0 × 2.97 = 14.9 cfs

STOP: The first iteration for flow did not result in calculating Q = 24.0 cfs. Therefore, a second iteration is required.

Iteration No. 2

Now, assume a flow depth of 1.2 feet and continue using an excelsior ECB having a roughness coefficient n = 0.035.

Calculate the cross-sectional area, wetted perimeter, and hydraulic radius of the trapezoidal channel for a flow depth d = 1.2 feet.

A = Z·d² = 5 × (1.2)² = 7.20 ft.²

WP = 2d × (Z² +1)^1/2 = 2 × 1.2 × (5² + 1)^1/2 = 12.2 ft.

R = A ¸WP = 7.20 ¸12.2 = 0.59 ft.

Ö     Calculate the flow velocity using:

V = (1 ¸n) × R^2/3 × S^1/2 = (1.486 ¸ 0.035) × (0.59)^2/3 × (0.0125)^1/2 = 3.36 ft./sec.

Ö    Calculate the flow rate using:

Q = A × V = 7.20 × 3.36 = 24.2 cfs »24.0 cfs [within acceptable measurement error]

Ö     Calculate the maximum shear stress using:

tmax  = 62.4 × Y × S = 62.4 × 1.2 × 0.0125 = 0.94 lbs./ft.²

Ö     Compare the calculated shear stress and velocity values to those found in Table III-2.

• An excelsior product has a maximum permissible shear stress of 1.44 to 2.00 lbs./ft.², which is greater than 0.94 lbs./ft.²
  • An excelsior product has a maximum permissible velocity of 4.9 to 7.9 ft./sec., which is greater than 3.36 ft./sec.

Therefore, it is possible to use a properly installed excelsior product.

Ö    Use Table III-2 to determine if anticipated shear stress values will impact vegetation when flows of 3.36 ft./sec. occur having a depth of 1.2 feet and no ECB material exists.

■         Class B vegetation cannot have shear stress values that exceed 2.09 lbs./ft.² > 0.94 lbs./ft.²

Therefore, when flows of 24.0 cfs occur, properly installed excelsior ECB should provide protection against channel erosion until Class B vegetation is established.

Designers are encouraged to evaluate shear stress and velocity for different scenarios. For example, if in the above example the channel slope were increased to 5.0%, then the shear stress would be about 2.6 lbs./ft.² with a flow velocity of 7.0 cfs and a water depth of 10 inches. Only a TRM can be installed in the channel to ensure adequate protection exists.

Finally, values reported in Table III-1 and Table III-2 provides only an estimate of how RECPs will perform. When developing specifications for a TRM or ECB, Designers must always obtain up-to-date shear stress and velocity information from manufacturers for their projects to ensure proper product selection.

Basin Slope Drain

A roadway project is to be constructed within a wooded area and on sandy soils. It has been determined that approximately 8.4 acres will discharge offsite flows onto the construction site. What diameter pipe for a slope drain is needed to route offsite flows caused by a 10-year storm event? Assume the offsite basin has an average slope of 2.3% and Time of Concentration of 12 minutes in Zone 3.

Step 1. Determine the from Table III-3 following this page:

C = 0.15 to 0.20

Step 2. Determine the rainfall intensity in Zone 3 from Figure III-15:

i = 6.8 inches/hour

Step 3. Calculate a theoretical pipe diameter from the equation:

D = 4.29 × Q^0.50 = 4.29 × (CiA)^0.50

When C = 0.15, D = 4.29 × (0.15 × 6.8 × 8.4)^0.50 = 12.6 inches

When C = 0.20, D = 4.29 × (0.20 × 6.8 × 8.4)^0.50 = 14.5 inches

Step 4: Determine the diameter pipe to use.

Unless the Designer is confident that the minimum runoff coefficient is applicable, use the worst case scenario to select a pipe having a readily available diameter. In this situation, it is possible to use a 15-inch diameter pipe—if one can be found. More than likely, an 18-inch diameter pipe will have to be installed.

Roadway Slope Drain

The above roadway project will have a section where approximately 160 feet of fill material will exist. The Designer observes from the plan and profile drawings that runoff from about 30 feet of upstream road construction will discharge onto where road fill material exists. In order to minimize damage to the two-lane road fill material, it is decided to install a series of 6-inch diameter slope drains. The first pipe will be installed to capture runoff from the upstream contributing 30 feet of roadway.

If each lane of the road is approximately 16 feet wide, how far apart should the slope drains be placed and what is the height of the containment berm along the edge of the roadway fill material for a 10-year storm event?

Step 1. Determine the intensity of rainfall occurring in Zone 3 when the time of concentration is 8 minutes:

i = 7.5 inches/hour Step 2. Calculate the distance between each slope drain:

L = (245.8 × D^2.5) ¸ (i × W) = (245.8 × 6^2.5) ¸(7.5 × 16 × 2) = 90 feet

Step 3: Calculate the height of the containment berm:

H = 2 × pipe diameter = 2 × 6 inches = 12 inches = 1.0 feet

Note: Since there are 160 linear feet of fill material, placing the slope drains about 90 feet apart will be adequate to convey road runoff via 6-inch diameter pipes.

Table III-3.     Runoff Coefficients for the Rational Method (from FDOT, 1987)

Figure III-12.       Zones for Precipitation Intensity Duration Frequency Curves as Developed by the FDOT (2001)

Figure III-13.       Rainfall Intensity Duration Frequency Curve for Zone 1 (FDOT, 2001)

Figure III-14.       Rainfall Intensity Duration Frequency Curve for Zone 2 (FDOT, 2001)

Figure III-15.       Rainfall Intensity Duration Frequency Curve for Zone 3 (FDOT, 2001)

Figure III-16.       Rainfall Intensity Duration Frequency Curve for Zone 4 (FDOT, 2001)

Figure III-17.       Rainfall Intensity Duration Frequency Curve for Zone 5 (FDOT, 2001)

Figure III-18.       Rainfall Intensity Duration Frequency Curve for Zone 6 (FDOT, 2001)

Figure III-19.       Rainfall Intensity Duration Frequency Curve for Zone 7 (FDOT, 2001)

Figure III-20.       Rainfall Intensity Duration Frequency Curve for Zone 8 (FDOT, 2001)

Figure III-21.       Rainfall Intensity Duration Frequency Curve for Zone 9 (FDOT, 2001)

Figure III-22.       Rainfall Intensity Duration Frequency Curve for Zone 10 (FDOT, 2001)

Figure III-23.       Rainfall Intensity Duration Frequency Curve for Zone 11 (FDOT, 2001)

III-50

SECTION IV

SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS

Table of Contents

INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 1

DESIGNING SCSS INTO AN E&SC DRAWING…………………………………………………………………………………………………. 1

DEFINING SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS…………………………………………………………………………………………….. 2

EFFECTIVENESS OF SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS…………………………………………………………………………….. 4

SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM OUTLET STRUCTURES………………………………………………………………………….. 9

Surface Skimmers…………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 9

Perforated Riser Pipes……………………………………………………………………………………………… 9

DEWATERING ACTIVITIES………………………………………………………………………………………….. 9

TYPES OF DEWATERING METHODS…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 9

Rim ditching…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 9

Sock pipe/Horizontal wells………………………………………………………………………………………. 10

Well-point systems………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 10

TURBIDITY MONITORING FOR OFF-SITE DISCHARGE…………………………………………………………………………………. 10

USING SCSS FOR DEWATERING…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 10

INCREASING THE EFFICIENCY OF A SCS…………………………………………………………………………….. 10

Pre-Sedimentation Basins……………………………………………………………………………………….. 17

Barriers for Pre-Sedimentation Basins……………………………………………………………………… 18

USE OF POLYMERS OR ALUM…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 33

Steps for Introducing Polymers into Runoff Waters…………………………………………………….. 33

Sediment Retention Barriers Using Polymers…………………………………………………………….. 34

Using Alum to Remove Sediment from Runoff Waters…………………………………………………. 35

EXAMPLES…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 36

SCS EFFECTIVENESS OF AN EXISTING POND……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 37

SIZING A DEWATERING SCS…………………………………………………………………………………………… 39

BUILDER PRE-SEDIMENTATION BASIN…………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 40

LINEAR ROAD PRE-SEDIMENTATION BASIN………………………………………………………………………………………………… 40

BMP Summary Sheets for Sediment Containment Systems

Sediment Containment System Internal Barrier and Weir…………………………………………………………. 10

Sediment Containment System Surface Skimmer……………………………………………………………………. 13

Sediment Containment System Riser Pipe Outlet Structure……………………………………………………….. 15

Sediment Containment System Rock Berm Outlet Structure……………………………………………………… 23

Sediment Containment System Single Chamber……………………………………………………………………… 25

Sediment Containment System Double Chamber……………………………………………………………………. 27

Sediment Containment System Barrier for Culvert………………………………………………………………….. 29

Sediment Containment System Filter Bag……………………………………………………………………………… 31

Table of Figures

FIGURE IV-1:        APPARENT EFFECTIVENESS GRAPH (FIFIELD, 2004)………………………………………. 7

FIGURE IV-2:        PEG CHART FOR SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS (FIFIELD, 2004)……………… 8

FIGURE IV-3:         ILLUSTRATION OF A SCS INTERNAL SILT FENCE BARRIER AND WEIR……………………. 12

FIGURE IV-4:        ILLUSTRATION OF A SCS SURFACE SKIMMER………………………………………………………………. 14

FIGURE IV-5:        ILLUSTRATION OF A SCS RISER PIPE OUTLET STRUCTURE……………………………………… 16

FIGURE IV-6:        CONCEPTUAL PRE-SEDIMENTATION (A.K.A. FOREBAY) BASINS (NO SCALE)……… 17

FIGURE IV-7:        HYDROLOGIC TYPE A SOILS LOADING RATIO GRAPH………………………………………………… 19

FIGURE IV-8:        HYDROLOGIC TYPE B SOILS LOADING RATIO GRAPH………………………………………………… 20

FIGURE IV-9:        HYDROLOGIC TYPE C SOILS LOADING RATIO GRAPH………………………………………………… 21

FIGURE IV-10:      HYDROLOGIC TYPE D SOILS LOADING RATIO GRAPH………………………………………………… 22

FIGURE IV-11:      ILLUSTRATION OF A SCS ROCK BERM OUTLET STRUCTURE…………………………………….. 24

FIGURE IV-12:      ILLUSTRATION OF A SINGLE CHAMBER SCS……………………………………………….. 26

FIGURE IV-13:      ILLUSTRATION OF A DOUBLE CHAMBER SCS………………………………………………. 28

FIGURE IV-14:      ILLUSTRATION OF A ROCK BARRIER STRUCTURE FOR CULVERTS…………………………… 30

FIGURE IV-15:      ILLUSTRATION OF A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM FILTER BAG………………………. 32

TABLE IV-1:          SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM CLASSIFICATIONS………………………………………………….. 3

TABLE IV-2:          MINIMUM PARAMETERS FOR SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS (FIFIELD, 2004) .5 TABLE IV-3: ESTIMATED SETTLING VELOCITIES FOR SUSPENDED PARTICLES (SPECIFIC

GRAVITY = 2.65) IN WATER AT DIFFERENT TEMPERATURES AS CALCULATED BY

STOKES’ LAW…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 6

INTRODUCTION

Sediment containment systems (SCSs) are barriers having hydraulic controls that function by modifying the storm-runoff hydrograph and slowing water velocities. This allows for the deposition of larger suspended particles by gravity. Some of the more common names for these structures are sediment basins, sediment ponds, and sediment traps.

The only structural BMPs that can effectively remove sediment when large storm water discharges occur from active construction sites are strategically placed SCSs. Since erosion control methods cannot always be implemented in a timely manner during the construction process, Designers must include properly designed SCSs as an integral part of their E&SC plan. More importantly, the development of effective SCSs must be based upon capturing design size particles.

The role of any SCS is to create conditions for sedimentation; that is, to allow for the settlement of suspended soil particles found in runoff waters. When soil-particle transport mechanisms, such as water or wind, move at a slow rate, particles can settle out of suspension due to gravity. Deposition of sediment in an SCS is dependent upon many different parameters, including:

• Mass of the suspended particles falling through contained waters
• Surface area and containment storage volume for incoming runoff waters
• Sufficient flow path lengths within the containment system
• Uniform flow zones within the storage volume
• Discharge rates of water out of the containment system

Designing SCSs into an E&SC Drawing

While construction sites present dynamic conditions, Designers can prepare for worse case scenarios by assuming the following on construction activities for lands that discharge into a SCS:

1. Land development activities result in 100% bare ground conditions.

a)      During the initial phase of over lot grading, temporary retention structures may be able to capture all contributing runoff waters. The EPA requires these containment volumes capture runoff resulting from a 2-year, 24-hour storm event when 10 acres or more of land is disturbed. The FDEP requires a minimum of 3,600 cubic feet of containment volume when 10 acres or more of land is disturbed.

1. Detention/retention design volumes usually exceed what is needed to capture runoff resulting from a 2-year, 24-hour storm event.

b)      The amount of bare ground will begin to decrease as installation of erosion control measures and pavement occurs.

c)      Once an outlet structure is installed, treatment of inflows and discharges may need to occur.

d)      Once a storm sewer system is installed and runoff discharges into a SCS, then treatment of inflows needs to occur.

IV-1

1. Constructing vertical/big box structures results in less than 100% bare ground conditions tributary to an SCS as the building process occurs.

a)      Install and maintain effective SCSs for vertical/big box construction activities until at least 80% full build out conditions exist.

b)      When the developer’s disturbed lands are totally re-vegetated, then only minimal treatment of runoff waters into the SCS may be required. However:

1. Vertical/big box construction activities will destroy nearly all pre-existing vegetation.
2. The amount of vertical/big box disturbed lands will vary depending upon the buildings under construction, installation of landscaping material, installation of walkways and driveways, pavement of parking lots, and so forth.
3. Often, development of strategically placed pre-sedimentation (a.k.a. forebay) basins will minimize vertical/big box construction impacts to downstream water bodies (i.e. ponds, canals, etc.).
4. If the developer’s land is not re-vegetated, then detention/retention ponds will intercept all sediment-laden runoff waters.

(1)   Sealing of pond bottoms may occur for untreated inflow waters.

(2)   Sediment-laden waters may discharge from the pond.

(3)   Large pre-sedimentation basins may be required.

1. Linear projects will result in 100% bare ground conditions that can be tributary to a SCS.

a)      During the initial phase of over lot grading, temporary SCSs can be developed and strategically placed to capture contributing runoff waters.

1. If installation of outlet structures occurs, treatment of discharge waters (e.g. adding a polymer, ensuring slow release rates, etc.) may need to occur.
2. Development of strategically placed pre-sedimentation basins can minimize linear construction impacts to downstream water bodies (i.e. ponds, canals, etc.).

b)      The amount of bare ground conditions will decrease as installation of erosion control measures and pavement occurs.

c)      Once a storm sewer system is installed:

1. Treatment of inflows into a containment system is advisable, if waters are released from the SCS.
2. Treatment of outflows is advisable when there is direct discharge into a water body or sensitive area.

Defining Sediment Containment Systems

When capturing all runoff waters, efficiency of the containment system is 100%. However, the feasibility of retaining all runoff waters throughout the life of a construction site (i.e. retention) may be difficult for most sites. Instead of trying to retain all runoff waters, a containment system should detain an adequate volume of runoff long enough to capture suspended “design size” particles. These systems are best represented by detention facilities.

Theoretically, design size particles can have any diameter. However, limitations will exist for design size particles depending upon whether the sediment consists of sandy or clayey materials.

IV-2

Designers need to select a design size particle that represents the largest percentage of the inflow sediments.

If detention of runoff from construction sites is to be effective in removing suspended particles, contained waters must remain long enough for deposition of suspended particles within the system to occur. This is not a simple task to achieve since suspended particles fall at different rates depending upon their mass. Since outflow from the system will occur, 100% reduction of all incoming suspended particles will not be possible without the addition of polymers.

It is suggested that SCSs be developed based upon design size particles to be removed from inflow waters. Such classifications can be found in Table IV-1.

Table IV-1: Sediment Containment System Classifications

Type-1 Sediment Containment System

A Type-1 SCS will require development of a structure to capture the maximum possible number of coarse silt and smaller suspended particles. Since particles of this size settle very slowly without flocculation, large storage volume Type-1 SCSs require long flow-path lengths, large containment volumes, and controlled discharges.

Usually, development of Type-1 SCSs requires the expertise of a professional having skills in proper design of embankments, outlet structures, and spillways.

Type-2 Sediment Containment System

The Type-2 SCS will capture suspended particles that settle faster than particles requiring Type- 1 structures. Consequently, use of smaller storage volumes and shorter flow-path lengths is feasible. As with a Type-1 structure, these sediment control systems will also have controlled discharges. The traditional sediment trap best represents Type-2 systems.

Depending upon the complexity of the structure, development of Type-2 SCSs may or may not require the expertise of a professional having skills in proper design of embankments, outlet structures, and spillways.

Type-3 Sediment Containment System

The least effective methods to control suspended particles in runoff waters are Type-3 SCSs. These are not necessarily design structures, as found with Type-1 and Type-2 systems, but are often temporary BMPs commonly found on construction sites such as silt-fence barriers, inlet control structures, and ditch check structures.

Whenever significant runoff occurs, all Type-3 systems have very low effectiveness to control suspended particles without some additional treatment (e.g. adding a polymer). However, when runoff is small and adequate maintenance exists, the Type-3 sediment control systems may be effective in removing larger diameter suspended particles. Extensive information on Type-3 systems appears in Section V.

IV-3

Effectiveness of Sediment Containment Systems

Field studies conducted by EPA (1976) to characterize containment systems and to evaluate their effectiveness for trapping sediment produced the following observations:

• Poor construction and inadequate maintenance of the sites were the major factors contributing to pond ineffectiveness.
• Predicted efficiency was higher than observed efficiency. Containment systems were effective in trapping sediment during baseline flows, but not during rainfall events.
  • Outlet riser pipes and emergency spillways were not properly sized. Trash quickly clogged the pipes. The rising waters rushed over the unprotected spillways and scoured out large holes in the embankment.
  • Containment systems that appeared to need cleaning transferred additional inflow directly to the outlet.

It was concluded from these studies that efficiencies of sediment containment systems could be increased by:

• Using techniques that reduce inflow energy
• Allowing sufficient travel time for design-size particles to fall through the water
• Preventing re-suspension of particles

Documentation on the effectiveness of containment systems for trapping suspended solids is limited and there are conflicting opinions on their actual effectiveness. However, the general concept is that if properly designed, constructed, and maintained, SCSs will always be effective in trapping some sediment.

Fifield (2004) developed equations found in Table IV-2, which can assist Designers with identifying minimum parameters for ensuring the development of effective containment structures. The equations assume removal of design size particles will occur when terminal (a.k.a. particle settling) velocity conditions exist.

One method (albeit not entirely accurate since sediments are not spherical in shape) for determining terminal velocities in water is to calculate the rate of fall based upon Stokes’ Law. Table IV-3 illustrates particle-settling velocities for some design size particles at different temperatures as calculated by Stokes’ Law.

Finally, equations found in Table IV-2 make reference to different graphs. Figure IV-1 provides an Apparent Effectiveness chart, which is a measure of a SCS to remove design size particles.

Figure IV-2 provides a graph to determine the percent of Particles Equal to or Greater (PEG) than a design size particle that can become suspended in water when runoff events occur.

Use of the equations and accompanying graphs are illustrated in the example found at the end of this section. Additional information on sizing a SCS exists in the publication by Fifield (2004).

IV-4

Table IV-2: Minimum Parameters for Sediment Containment Systems (Fifield, 2004)

LEGEND

AEff = Apparent effectiveness (%) of the SCS to remove design size (and larger) particles suspended in runoff waters = 20(L ¸ W_e) – (L ¸ W_e)²

Davg = (Actual volume) ¸ (actual surface area)

Vs = Particle settling velocity (ft./sec.)

L = Particle flow distance (ft.)

VOLm = Minimum water volume (ft.³)

NEff = Net effectiveness (%) of the SCS to remove all particles suspended in runoff waters

We = Effective pond width (ft.)

PEG = Percent of particles that are equal to or greater than the design-size particle (%)

Qout= Outflow (ft.³/sec.)

IV-5

Table IV-3: Estimated Settling Velocities for Suspended Particles (Specific Gravity = 2.65) in Water at Different Temperatures as Calculated by Stokes’ Law

COMMONLY USED CONVERSION FACTORS

1.0 cm/sec. = 0.03281 ft. /sec. = 0.3937 in./sec.

1.0 m = 3.281 ft. = 39.37 in.

1.0 in. = 2.54 cm = 25.4 mm

1.0 ha. = 2.471 ac. = 107,637 ft.²

1.0 m³ = 35.3 ft.³

°C = 5/9 (°F – 32°)

NOTE:    Design size particles larger than 0.10 mm are assumed to accelerate downward through water based upon Newtonian principles.

A conservative approach to sizing SCSs is to use a settling velocity when a water temperature is at its lowest value.

IV-6

Figure IV-1: Apparent Effectiveness Graph (Fifield, 2004)

IV-7

Figure IV-2: PEG Chart for Sediment Containment Systems (Fifield, 2004)

IV-8

Sediment Containment System Outlet Structures

An important element of effective sediment containment systems is the outlet structure. These are required when containing runoff waters by any structure and can include the following systems.

Surface Skimmers

Skimmers remove water from the upper pond layers of a Type-1 SCS. Since the upper layer of water will have the least amount of suspended particles, discharges may be relatively free of sediment. This method is one of the more effective outlet structures to use for large containment systems (see Figure IV-4). Unfortunately, without additional treatment, discharges through a skimmer will usually not meet water quality turbidity standards. However, when a polymer or alum is introduced into the system that results in clear water within the upper (i.e. 3- to 6-inches) pond depths, then discharges through a skimmer may meet water quality turbidity standards.

Selection of a skimmer is dependent upon how long water is to be detained within the SCS. In absence of regulatory requirements, it is recommended that contained waters take about 48 hours to drain from an SCS.

Perforated Riser Pipes

Commonly used outlet structures for a Type-1 SCS are PVC or corrugated metal riser pipes. They release water through the top of the pipe and through side perforations. Since removal of contained waters occurs at different elevations, their effectiveness is less than skimmers (see Figure IV-5). In absence of regulatory guidelines, it is recommended that contained waters take about 48 hours to drain from an SCS.

Increased trapping efficiency of a riser pipe will occur by placing a rock barrier around the perforated section. However, when rock is not available, then placement of fabric material around a perforated riser pipe might have to occur. Unfortunately, use of the wrong fabric will result in clogging of the material resulting in the lack of drainage, which causes difficulties in maintenance of the structure. Therefore, it is critical that Designers specify the proper selection of fabric to ensure pore clogging does not happen.

DEWATERING ACTIVITIES

Dewatering operations are an important component in the construction process and receive special attention from the local water management agencies. Regulators are especially concerned with the protection of wetlands from drawdown effects and protecting the receiving water body from sedimentation and capacity limitations.

Types of Dewatering Methods

Rim Ditching

Rim ditching is one of the more commonly used dewater methods where a ditch is excavated along the inside perimeter of the excavation area and a pump is used to keep the level of the ground water below the bottom surface of the excavation. This is the least expensive of the methods, requiring only a trash pump and backhoe. However, it produces the dirtiest water that must be treated prior to offsite discharge. While rim ditching may be the cheapest method of construction dewatering, potential costs of treating water prior to discharge may result in much higher costs.

IV-9

Sock Pipe/Horizontal Wells

The second common method of dewatering used in Florida includes the installation of perforated plastic pipes, usually wrapped in geosynthetic fabric, in a horizontal fashion on the inside of the excavation pit. While this method is more expensive to install then the traditional rim ditching, it does produce significantly cleaner discharge water. Initial installation of the sock pipe is limited to 15-20 feet. However deeper dewatering depth can be achieved in phases. The use of sock pipe is limited in clay soils.

Well Point Systems

The last of Florida’s common method of dewatering includes the installation of multiple shallow wells that are attached to a main collection pipe attached to a central pump. Well point systems are typically used in linear projects such as installation of pipelines and culverts in roadways and shallow, linear ponds. The cost of this method is the most expensive of the three methods; however, it produces the cleanest water.

Turbidity Monitoring for Off-site Discharge

When dewatering operations consist of off-site discharge, the contractor must ensure the effluent meets state water quality standards. The standards for discharging water into a receiving body cannot exceed 29 nephelometric turbidity units (NTU’s) above background. Samples of the effluent should be taken at the discharge point into the receiving body. For best results, samples should be taken 2 times a day, at least 4 hours apart.

Using SCSs for Dewatering

All of the dewatering activities described above usually will involve pumping water into a temporary containment system to ensure proper settlement of suspended particles. The equations found in Table IV-2 can assist Designers in development of a small SCS needed for these dewatering activities. Unfortunately, it is not known what the diameter of suspended particles will occur during pumping activities. However, Designers can provide preliminary assessments and recommendations using the following assumptions:

• The design size particle will be 0.02 mm
• The discharge rate of water out of the SCS will equal the pumping rate
• The minimum volume of contained water will be that found for a Type-2 system

Once actual field conditions exist, changes to Designer’s preliminary recommendations may occur due to finding larger design size particles, greater outflows, use of polymers, and so forth. An example of sizing an SCS for dewatering activities is illustrated at the end of this section.

Increasing the Efficiency of a SCS

How can more particles be captured by a SCS? One method is to capture all runoff waters. However, this is neither practical nor feasible. Another technique is to increase the flow path that runoff waters have to travel within the structure before discharging. Unfortunately, physical limitations of the pond, re-suspension problems, lack of uniform sizing (a Stokes Law assumption for development of Table IV-3), and so forth will prevent this theoretical solution.

IV-10

Sediment Containment System Internal Barrier and Weir

WHAT IS ITS PURPOSE?

To extend the flow path length of suspended particles within a sediment containment system.

WHERE AND HOW IS IT COMMONLY USED (SEE FIGURE IV-3 FOR AN EXAMPLE)?

WHEN SHOULD IT BE INSTALLED?

■         Immediately after the sediment containment system is constructed.

■         Before construction activities begin.

■         While construction activities are occurring.

WHEN SHOULD IT NOT BE INSTALLED?

■         Where high inflow runoff waters exist.

■         As a “stand alone” method that is not part of a properly designed SCS.

■         Where high internal pond flow velocities exists due to improper outlet structures.

■         After grading activities are completed.

WHAT NEEDS TO BE INSPECTED?

WHAT MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES CAN BE EXPECTED?

IV-11

Figure IV-3:    Illustration of a SCS Internal Silt Fence Barrier and Weir

Permission is given by HydroDynamics Incorporated to copy and reproduce this detail

IV-12

Sediment Containment System Surface Skimmer

WHAT IS ITS PURPOSE?

To drain a sediment containment system by removing water from the top layer where the least amount of suspended particles exist.

WHERE AND HOW IS IT COMMONLY USED (SEE FIGURE IV-4)?

WHEN SHOULD IT BE INSTALLED?

■         Immediately after a Type-1 sediment containment system is constructed.

■         Before construction activities begin.

■         To increase the effectiveness of capturing suspended particles that has been treated with a polymer or alum.

■         While construction activities are occurring.

WHEN SHOULD IT NOT BE INSTALLED?

■         In small basins better suited for Type-2 Sediment Containment Systems.

WHAT NEEDS TO BE INSPECTED?

WHAT MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES CAN BE EXPECTED?

Notes

■         Unless advised otherwise, resident time of contained waters within an SCS is at least 48 hours.

■         See Table IV-2 for equations to size an SCS as well as examples at the end of this section.

IV-13

Figure IV-4: Illustration of a SCS Surface Skimmer

Permission is given by HydroDynamics Incorporated to copy and reproduce this detail

IV-14

Sediment Containment System Riser Pipe Outlet Structure

WHAT IS ITS PURPOSE?

Provide controlled release of contained water.

WHERE AND HOW IS IT COMMONLY USED (SEE FIGURE IV-12)?

WHEN SHOULD IT BE INSTALLED?

■         Immediately after the sediment containment system is constructed.

■         Before construction activities begin.

■         While construction activities are occurring.

WHEN SHOULD IT NOT BE INSTALLED?

■         After grading activities are completed.

WHAT NEEDS TO BE INSPECTED?

WHAT MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES CAN BE EXPECTED?

Notes

■         It is important that wrapping a riser pipe of an SCS with a fabric material not occur since clogging with clay and silt particles will occur, which will prevent proper drainage.

■         Sizing is dependent upon the amount of inflow and required outflow from the containment system.

■         Unless advised otherwise, resident time of contained waters within an SCS is at least 48 hours.

■         See Table IV-2 for equations to size an SCS as well as examples at the end of this section.

IV-15

Figure IV-5: Illustration of a SCS Riser Pipe Outlet Structure

Permission is given by HydroDynamics Incorporated to copy and reproduce this detail

IV-16

During the construction phase of a project, significant amounts of sediment can potentially flow into (and often out of) a SCS. Increased efficiency can occur by trapping larger diameter particles with a pre-sedimentation (a.k.a. forebay) and/or introducing a polymer (when suspended clay colloidal materials exist) or possibly alum (for other types of colloidal materials).

Pre-Sedimentation Basins

Essentially, a pre-sedimentation basin is a small SCS specifically designed to capture anticipated sediment loading from disturbed lands. However, it is important that sufficient volume exist to capture larger diameter sediments while inflows equal outflows. Figure IV-6 illustrates some conceptual pre-sedimentation basins in which deposition of larger suspended particles occur.

Figure IV-6: Conceptual Pre-Sedimentation (a.k.a. Forebay) Basins (No Scale)

The concept of a pre-sedimentation basin is simple; instead of allowing inflow waters to discharge directly into a large detention/retention pond, they first enter a smaller containment system to allow for the deposition of larger suspended particles. These pre-sedimentation basins can be periodically cleaned to remove accumulated sediments.

During the land development or linear phase of a project, Designers must use data on upstream erodibility of soils, hydrologic characteristics of contributing basins, and a design storm event to determine the size of a pre-sedimentation basin. By applying and modifying information found in Fifield (2004), use the following equations to calculate the size of a pre-sedimentation basin (see examples at the end of this section):

IV-17

Sediment Yield = (K_site ¸ K_chart) × LR × A^1.12 (cubic feet)                                                                                                        Equation IV-7 Surface Area = 0.67 × Sediment Yield (square feet)                                                                                                        Equation IV-8 Length = 3.79 × (Surface Area) ^0.50 (feet)                                                                                                        Equation IV-9

Width = 0.10 × Length   (feet)                                                          Equation IV-10

Where  K_site = Anticipated Soil Erodibility Factor of the site

K_chart = Soil Erodibility Factor found on Figure IV-7 through Figure IV-10 LR = Loading Ratio value found from Figure IV-7 through Figure IV-10 A = Contributing area in acres

It is important that all pre-sedimentation basins have a minimum depth of 18 inches.

An added benefit for full build out conditions may exist when installing and maintaining a pre- sedimentation basin that becomes part of a detention/retention facility. Such a facility can be part of the water quality features needed to ensure that the project remains compliant for post- construction conditions.

Barriers for Pre-Sedimentation Basins

A riprap barrier at the discharge end of a pre-sedimentation basin provides a simple method to detain runoff waters and still allow for the deposition of larger sized suspended particles while ensuring inflow values equal outflow values. Figure IV-11 through Figure IV-14 illustrates these types of containment structures.

Use of these barriers is more commonly for “in-line” basins placed within drainage channels. It is important that sufficient spillway width be available to ensure flood flow conditions can occur without damaging the structure.

Another type of barrier consists of material placed in front of a culvert in a manner that allows for pond development and conveyance of inflow waters from drainage swales or upstream storm sewer systems. It is important that proper design and installation occur to ensure outflow values are not less than inflow values (see Figure IV-14).

Occasionally there is a need for small containment systems such as when pumping water from behind cofferdams or small dewatering projects. The filter bag (see Figure IV-15) may provide a temporary method for removing larger diameter particles suspended in runoff waters.

Figure IV-7: Hydrologic Type A Soils Loading Ratio Graph

Figure IV-8: Hydrologic Type B Soils Loading Ratio Graph

Figure IV-9: Hydrologic Type C Soils Loading Ratio Graph

Figure IV-10: Hydrologic Type D Soils Loading Ratio Graph

Sediment Containment System Rock Berm Outlet Structure

WHAT IS ITS PURPOSE?

Provide a relatively maintenance free method for releasing contained waters when outflow values are equal to inflow values.

WHERE AND HOW IS IT COMMONLY USED(SEE FIGURE IV-11)?

WHEN SHOULD IT BE INSTALLED?

■         Immediately after the sediment containment system is constructed.

■         Before major construction activities begin.

■         While construction activities are occurring.

WHEN SHOULD IT NOT BE INSTALLED?

■         After grading activities are completed unless wetlands are to be developed.

WHAT NEEDS TO BE INSPECTED?

WHAT MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES CAN BE EXPECTED?

Notes

.

Figure IV-11: Illustration of a SCS Rock Berm Outlet Structure

Permission is given by HydroDynamics Incorporated to copy and reproduce this detail

Sediment Containment System Single Chamber

WHAT IS ITS PURPOSE?

To cause the deposition of large diameter suspended particles in runoff waters from small contributory basins.

WHERE AND HOW IS IT COMMONLY USED (SEE FIGURE IV-12)?

WHEN SHOULD IT BE INSTALLED?

■         Before construction activities begin.

■         While construction activities are occurring.

■         To treat waters being pumped from behind coffer dams and for dewatering activities.

WHEN SHOULD IT NOT BE INSTALLED?

■         After grading activities are finished.

■         As the only method to capture suspended particles without some type of chemical treatment.

WHAT NEEDS TO BE INSPECTED?

WHAT MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES CAN BE EXPECTED?

Notes

■         Basin parameters L = Length and W_e = Width as calculated by the Designer from equations found in the pre-sedimentation basin section.

■         Develop the outlet structure so that it is able to safely convey flood flows for design storm events.

Figure IV-12: Illustration of a Single Chamber SCS

Permission is given by HydroDynamics Incorporated to copy and reproduce this detail

Sediment Containment System Double Chamber

WHAT IS ITS PURPOSE?

To cause the deposition of large diameter suspended particles in runoff waters from small contributory basins.

WHERE AND HOW IS IT COMMONLY USED (SEE FIGURE IV-13)?

WHEN SHOULD IT BE INSTALLED?

■         Before construction activities begin.

■         While construction activities are occurring.

■         To treat waters being pumped from behind cofferdams and for dewatering activities.

WHEN SHOULD IT NOT BE INSTALLED?

■         After grading activities are finished.

■         As the only method to capture suspended particles without some type of chemical treatment.

WHAT NEEDS TO BE INSPECTED?

WHAT MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES CAN BE EXPECTED?

Notes

■         The length parameter is to be reduced by 50% (i.e., L_final = ½ × Length) as calculated by the Designer from equations found in the pre-sedimentation basin section.

■         Develop the outlet structure so that it is able to safely convey flood flows for design storm events.

Figure IV-13: Illustration of a Double Chamber SCS

Permission is given by HydroDynamics Incorporated to copy and reproduce this detail

Sediment Containment System Barrier for Culvert

WHAT IS ITS PURPOSE?

To reduce inflow velocity so that deposition of suspended particles found in runoff can occur upstream of the barrier.

WHERE AND HOW IS IT COMMONLY USED (SEE FIGURE IV-14)?

WHEN SHOULD IT BE INSTALLED?

■         Before construction activities begin.

■         While construction activities are occurring.

WHEN SHOULD IT NOT BE INSTALLED?

■         After grading activities are completed.

■         If it appears they will interfere with the discharge of major runoff.

WHAT NEEDS TO BE INSPECTED?

WHAT MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES CAN BE EXPECTED?

Notes

■         Installation of a fabric that does not become clogged with clay and silt particles that impact the material’s permeability might be adequate for use in place of a rock barrier.

Figure IV-14:    Illustration of a Rock Barrier Structure for Culverts

Sediment Containment System Filter Bag

WHAT IS ITS PURPOSE?

To remove larger diameter size particles from sediment-laden waters by filtration.

WHERE AND HOW IS IT COMMONLY USED (SEE FIGURE IV-15)?

WHEN SHOULD IT BE INSTALLED?

■         Prior to pumping contained water captured behind a barrier.

■         Prior to pumping operations associated with dewatering activities.

■         While construction activities are occurring.

WHEN SHOULD IT NOT BE INSTALLED?

■         After grading activities are completed.

WHAT NEEDS TO BE INSPECTED?

WHAT MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES CAN BE EXPECTED?

Figure IV-15: Illustration of a Sediment Containment System Filter Bag

Permission is given by HydroDynamics Incorporated to copy and reproduce this detail

Use of Polymers or Alum

When polymers or alum are added in correct amounts to sediment-laden waters, suspended colloidal particles combine resulting in an increased mass that is subject to acceleration by gravity through the water column. However, Designers need to be aware that polymers or alum may be detrimental to aquatic life if introduced in inappropriate quantities or not properly selected for site conditions. For example, cationic charge polymers can adhere to the gills of fish and may cause suffocation if not properly evaluated and introduced into contained waters.

Anionic polymers do not adhere to fish gills. More detailed information about the use of polymers and alum appears in Appendix III.

If the erosion of contributing soils results in runoff having suspended clay colloidal particles, properly introducing the use of polymers into these waters may dramatically reduce the size of a SCS, perhaps down to a pre-sedimentation basin. More importantly, proper use of polymers may assist in ensuring discharge waters from construction sites do not exceed Florida’s water quality standard of 29 (or less) NTUs above background conditions. If suspended particles are not clay colloidal particles, then the Designer may require more detailed analyses if other chemicals (e.g., alum) may have to be introduced into runoff waters to achieve deposition (see Appendix III).

Steps for Introducing Polymers into Runoff Waters

If polymers are to be used to increase the efficiency of an SCS, it is important that Designers complete the following steps:

Step 1: Select Polymers Using Performance Based Standards

Obtain representative soil and water samples from the active construction site and have them tested for a polymer that demonstrates superior removal capacity of suspended particles found in runoff waters. Tests need to demonstrate that within 60 seconds; at least 95% of all sediment and suspended colloidal particles found in 29-inch (735 mm) high vertical water column are captured and accelerating downward. More than likely, performance based tests will have to be completed while construction activities continue to ensure optimal capturing capabilities of the polymer remains viable.

Step 2: Determine Design Inflow Values and Accompanying Polymer Concentration

Sediment yields will vary depending upon the amount of land not protected against erosion as well as the magnitude of rainfall. Thus, it is important that Designers fully evaluate anticipated flows in drainage ditches and storm sewer systems that discharge into a SCS.

Specific frequency storm events are a norm for designing a detention pond or selecting the size of an inlet opening. The EPA emulated this requirement by specifying that when 10-acres or more of land is disturbed, a sediment containment system is to capture runoff resulting from a 2- year, 24-hour storm event. As a minimum, FDEP requires that once 10-acres or more of land are disturbed, at least 1-inch of runoff per unit area is to be contained (i.e. 3,600 cubic feet per disturbed upstream acre).

At each major inflow location (e.g. pipe, drainage swale, etc.) to a SCS, it is important that Designers determine flow rates resulting from at least a 2-year, 24-hour frequency storm event. More stringent requirements may be imposed by different regulatory agencies. It is at these inflow locations where the introduction of polymers is to occur in a manner (using manufacturer’s specifications) that ensures optimal mixing.

Step 3: Determine Anticipated Sediment Yields

Figure IV-7 through Figure IV-10 provide charts to calculate anticipated sediment yields for 100% bare ground conditions assuming Hydrologic Type A through Hydrologic Type D soils, respectively. These values were calculated using the Modified Universal Soil Loss Equation (MUSLE) (Williams, 1976) as customized by Fifield (2004) and can be adjusted for different erodibility (i.e. K–Factor) values to reflect site conditions.

Step 4: Complete Sizing of the Pre-Sedimentation (a.k.a. forebay) Basin

When proper selection of a polymer is done, it is possible for nearly 100% of the suspended and colloidal particles to settle out of the runoff waters when design storm events occur. However, when these particles settle to the bottom of a detention/retention pond or lake, the possibility exists that infiltration properties will be compromised. Fortunately, development of a properly sized pre-sedimentation (a.k.a. forebay) basin to capture deposited material can overcome this potential problem.

Sediment Retention Barriers Using Polymers

Appendix III illustrates a different SCS from above, namely Sediment Retention Barriers (SRB). These structures are placed around area (a.k.a. catch basin) drains to treat sediment-laden runoff waters.

As discussed in Appendix III, SRBs can consist of a double row of silt fence barriers placed about 4- to 6-feet apart. Loose mulch, straw, woodchips, or other organic matter is mixed or blended with the site-specific polymer and placed between the silt fence barriers. The polymer within the mulch reacts with the suspended sediments, binding them into large particles that are trapped within the material.

Failure of these SRBs will occur if they are not installed correctly. Some specific items Designers need to address in their SWPPP include the following:

1. Selection of silt fence fabric material must be made to ensure passage of runoff waters will allow inflows to equal outflows. This implies that the standard woven or needle punched silt fence materials often found on construction sites will not be adequate. A minimum suggested permeability value of silt fence material is 75 gpm/ft².
2. Silt fence barriers will require diagonal bracing and wire backing to prevent collapsing of the structure.
   1. Site selection of an SRB must be made to ensure sufficient containment volume exists around the structure to allow for temporary storage of inflow waters for a proposed design storm event.
   2. Inspection and maintenance of SRBs is critical to ensure free passage of contained runoff waters.

It is important that Designers work with professionals that are experienced in using polymers on construction sites. In this manner, potential environmental problems can be professionally addressed and problems avoided.

Using Alum to Remove Sediment from Runoff Waters

Some sediment found in runoff waters will not react with polymers (e.g. coral), but may react with alum. The use of alum within an erosion and sediment control plan will require the use of a properly designed sediment containment system.

Once alum has been identified as an option in a stormwater retrofit project, extensive laboratory testing must be performed to verify the feasibility of alum treatment and to establish process design parameters. The feasibility of alum treatment for a particular construction activity related stormwater stream is typically evaluated in a series of laboratory jar tests conducted on representative runoff samples collected from the project watershed area.

Alum treatment requires close monitoring of dosages since overdosing may be harmful. In addition, alum may result in lowered pH and elevated levels of Al⁺³ if improperly applied. As with using polymers, it is important that Designers work with professionals that are experienced in using alum on construction sites. In this manner, potential environmental problems can be professionally addressed and problems avoided. Additional information on the use of alum appears in Appendix III.

EXAMPLES

SCS Effectiveness of an Existing Pond

When a detention/retention pond is to be part of the development, it should be one of the first items constructed and converted into an effective SCS. As an example, consider a site having the following parameters for a land development project in Orange County, Florida where predominate soil types are Smyrna loamy fine sands.

• Contributing Basin = 18.5 Acres
• Maximum Surface Area of Pond = 12,800 Square Feet
• Flow Path within Pond =200 Feet
• Average Pond Width = 64 Feet

If a SCS is to be effective it must meet criteria that ensure an efficient system exists. The following steps illustrate how this is accomplished:

Step 1:       Complete a PEG Soils Analyses

Usually, when development occurs, soil analyses of contributing lands are routine; however, in the event that such data are not available, cursory values can be obtained from the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) by consulting their soil surveys. Assume for this example that data obtained from the NRCS survey resulted in development of the graph shown at the right.

The PEG graph of Smyrna loamy fine sands demonstrates that about 90% of particles have diameters that are about 0.075 mm (0.003-in.) and larger. This indicates that at least 10% of the suspended particles entering the pond will be smaller than 0.075 mm (0.003-in.). More than likely, turbidity values associated with runoff waters can be related to particles having diameters smaller than 0.075 mm (0.003-in.).

For this example, we will consider our design size particle to have a diameter of 0.075 mm (0.003-in.).

Step 2:       Evaluate    how                  Surface      Area Varies with Discharges

For this exercise, our design size particle for the SCS calculations will remain at 0.075 mm (0.003-in.). Using equations found in Table IV-2, we see that a minimum surface area (square feet) of a pond is calculated by:

SA_m = (1.2 × Qout) ¸ Vs

From Table IV-3, a 0.075 mm (0.003-in.) diameter particle will have a settling velocity of about 0.01107 ft. /sec. at a water temperature of 50 degrees Fahrenheit. Notice that settling velocities of suspended particles become less in colder water due to greater fluid viscosity. Conversely, settling velocities increase for warmer waters. Designers should always select a representative cold-water temperature when designing a SCS to ensure greater capture of suspended particles when warmer inflow water conditions exist.

From Table IV-2, we see that:

SA_m = (1.2 × Qout) ¸ Vs = (1.2 × Qout) ¸ 0.011 = 109 × Qout     (square feet)

Since minimum surface area of the pond is dependent upon the discharge from the system, the above equation allows for development of the following table to evaluate what pond surface areas must exist if capturing 0.075 mm (0.003-in.) diameter particles is feasible for different outflows:

The above table demonstrates for large discharge values that the existing pond surface area of 12,800 square feet is more than adequate for capturing suspended 0.075 mm (0.003-in.) diameter particles. Now the only question lies with determining a pond effectiveness to capture design size and larger, particles by gravitational means.

Step 3:       Calculate the Apparent Effectiveness of the System to Capture Design Size Particles

Using the above information, it is found that L/W_e ratio is 200 feet ¸ 64 feet = 3.1. By using Figure IV-1, the following graph illustrates the apparent effectiveness of this pond to capture

0.075 mm (0.003-in.) and a larger diameter particle is about 52%.

Step 4:       Calculate the Net Effectiveness of the System

The AEff value of 52% gives an indicator of effectiveness for the existing pond to capture design size and larger particles associated with inflows of runoff from contributing lands, assuming terminal velocity conditions exist. However, this value does not represent the net effectiveness of a SCS to remove all suspended particles.

Earlier, we found that about 90% of the contributing land particles (i.e. PEG = 90%) are 0.075 mm (0.003-in.) and larger. Therefore, the net effectiveness (see Table IV-2) of this pond to capture suspended design size particles of 0.075 mm (0.003-in.) and larger is:

NEff = AEff × PEG = 52% × 90% = 46.8%

While this pond may capture about 47% of the particles that are 0.075 mm (0.003-in.) and larger, it still will release nearly 100% – 47% = 53% of all incoming sediments when discharge occurs.

Sizing a Dewatering SCS

Dewatering activities need to occur to reduce the ground water level for construction activities. It has been decided that pumping rates will vary from 125 to 300 gallons per minute (gpm). In order to maximize the treatment of waters, the Designer has decided a SCS structure should have a length to width ratio of at least 7.0 with the pumped water being discharged into a double chamber system (see Figure IV-13):

Step 1: Decide Upon a Design Size Particle to Treat.

Since no information about the size of suspended particles exist, assume treatment will be for a 0.02 mm (0.0008-in.) diameter particle when ground water has a temperature of 60°F.

Step 2: Determine the Settling Velocity and Range of Discharge Values.

From Table IV-3, a 0.02 mm (0.0008-in.) particle will fall through 60°F water at about 0.00105 ft. /sec.

125 gallons per minute = 125 gpm × 0.00228 cfs/gpm = 0.29 cfs

and 300 gpm = 0.68 cfs.

Step 3: Calculate and Decide Upon the Minimum SCS Pond Surface Area.

SA_m = (1.2 × Q    ) ¸ Vs = (1.2 × 0.29) ¸ 0.00105 = 331 ft.²

and

SA_m = (1.2 × Q    ) ¸ Vs = (1.2 × 0.68) ¸ 0.00105 = 777 ft.²

out

The Designer decides to be conservative and uses 800 ft.²Step 4: Calculate the Remaining Parameters.

L = [(L ¸W_e) × SAm] ^0.5 = [7.0 × 800] ^0.50 = 75 feet

W_e = SAm ¸ L = 800 ¸ 75 = 11 feet D_avg³2.2 ft.

VOL_m ³ 2.2 × SA_m ³ 2.2 x 800 ³ 1,760 ft.³

Step 5:  Since a Double Chamber is to be used, Convert the Length and Width Values.

From Page IV-26, L_final = ½ × L = 37.5 feet long. Thus, each chamber in the temporary SCS should be about 37.5 feet long, 11 feet wide, and have an average depth of around 2.2 feet.

Additional information on dewatering methods appears in Appendix II.

Builder Pre-Sedimentation Basin

A builder purchases 15 acres of re-vegetated land from a developer on which 50 condominiums will be built. The land has an average slope (V: H) of 0.50% with approximately 10% held in a natural condition.

The development is located within Hydrologic Type B soils having an erodibility factor of 0.24. Assuming a polymer is introduced into the storm drain system, determine the size of a pre- sedimentation basin constructed at the outfall of the storm sewer system to treat runoff due to a 2-year, 24-hour storm event of 3.50 inches.

Step 1: Determine the Amount of Land that will be Under Construction.

Different land disturbing scenarios can exist depending upon how the builder wants to construct the condominiums. However, a worse case scenario exists when all the possible land is being disturbed.

A = 15 acres – (10% of 15 acres) = 13.5 acres Step 2:  Determine the Sediment Yield.

From Figure IV-8, LR = 46 cubic feet/acres^1.12 when a 2-year, 24-hour storm event occurs on a watershed with a 0.50% (V: H). Notice that the chart erodibility value is K = 0.30, but the site erodibility value is 0.24. Thus, it is necessary to adjust the LR value.

Sediment Yield = (0.24 ¸ 0.30) × 46 × 13.5^1.12 = 679 cubic feet

Step 3:  Determine the Pre-Sedimentation Basin Parameters.

Surface Area = 0.67 × 679 = 455 square feet Length = 3.79 × (455) ^0.5 = 81 feet

Width = 0.10 × 81 = 8 feet

Depth = 18 in. = 1.5 ft. (recommended minimum depth)

Thus, creating a structure at the storm sewer discharge pipe that is at least 81 feet long, about 8 feet wide, and 18 inches deep will serve as a pre-sedimentation basin.

Linear Road Pre-Sedimentation Basin

A highway project contractor has to ensure runoff waters from about 5.0 acres of disturbed lands that flows through a drainage ditch before discharging into a river will meet 29 NTUs above background conditions when a storm event of 2.75 inches occur.

The Designers completed an analysis of the area and concluded the following:

• The average slope of contributing lands is about 2.50% (2.5 feet V: 100 feet H).
• Contributing lands are Hydrologic Type C soils with K = 0.40

Assume tests indicate that the addition of a polymer within the drainage channel will provide conditions to remove nearly 100% of the suspended colloidal particles, determine the parameters of an “in-line” temporary sedimentation basin.

Step 1: Determine the Sediment Yield.

When 2.75 inches of rain falls on a bare ground slope of 2.50%, then LR = 210 cu. ft/ac^1.12 and Sediment Yield = (0.40 ¸ 0.43) × 210 × 5.0^1.12 = 1,185 cubic feet

Step 2: Calculate the Temporary Sedimentation Basin Parameters.

Surface Area = 0.67 × 1,185 = 794 square feet Length = 3.79 × (794) ^0.5 = 106 feet

Width = 0.10 × 106 = 11 feet Depth = 1.5 feet

Thus, when sufficient polymer is continually introduced into runoff waters discharging from 5.0 acres of disturbed lands, a pre-sedimentation basin about 106 feet long, 11 feet wide, and 18 inches deep is required. It may be adequate to place the SCS in line with the drainage swale to capture anticipated sediment loads caused by a 2.75-inch (and smaller) storm event.

IV-41

SECTION V

TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION SITE BMPS

Table of Contents

INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 1

USING BARRIERS TO REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM RUNOFF WATERS………………… 1

LIMITATION OF BALE BARRIERS………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 1

SILT-FENCE BARRIERS……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 2

FIBER LOGS……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 2

TEMPORARY COMPOST BERMS…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 2

AREA-DRAIN (A.K.A. DROP, CATCH BASIN, OR DITCH BOTTOM) INLET BARRIERS……………………….. 2

BARRIERS FOR STORM SEWER CURB INLET OPENINGS………………………………………………………………………….. 3

Curb and Gutter Sediment Containment System…………………………………………………………… 4

Inlet Inserts……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 4

Cellular Confinement Systems……………………………………………………………………………………. 4

USING POLYMERS TO INCREASE SEDIMENT REMOVAL FROM RUNOFF WATERS…………………………….. 5

USING BMPS WHEN BUILDING BOX CULVERTS…………………………………………………………………………………… 34

Summary Sheets for Sediment Control BMPs

Silt Fence Barrier………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 6

Fiber Log Barriers for Individual Lots…………………………………………………………………………… 8

Continuous Berm Barrier…………………………………………………………………………………………….. 10

Geosynthetic Barrier……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 12

Turbidity Barrier………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 14

Water Filled Barrier……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 16

Rock Barrier for an Area Drain (a.k.a. Drop, Catch Basin, or Ditch Bottom) Inlet………… 18

Frame & Filter Barrier for Area Drain (a.k.a. Drop, Catch Basin, or Ditch Bottom) Inlets

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 20

Curb Inlet “Sump” Barrier………………………………………………………………………………………….. 22

Curb Inlet Diversion Berm…………………………………………………………………………………………… 24

Curb and Gutter Sediment Containment System Detail………………………………………………… 26

Curb Inlet Insert…………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 28

Soil Tracking Prevention Device…………………………………………………………………………………… 30

Cellular Confinement System………………………………………………………………………………………. 32

Table of Figures

FIGURE V-1:     HOW BARRIERS AROUND AREA DRAINS ON A GRADE FAIL DURING RUNOFF EVENTS 3 FIGURE V-2:                     ILLUSTRATION OF A SILT FENCE BARRIER…………………………………………………………………………….. 7

FIGURE V-3.     ILLUSTRATION OF FIBER LOG BARRIERS FOR INDIVIDUAL LOTS………………………………………. 9

FIGURE V-4:     ILLUSTRATION OF A CONTINUOUS BERM BARRIER…………………………………………………………… 11

FIGURE V-5:     ILLUSTRATION OF A GEOSYNTHETIC BARRIER…………………………………………………………………… 13

FIGURE V-6:     ILLUSTRATION OF A TURBIDITY BARRIER CURTAIN…………………………………………………………… 15

FIGURE V-7:     ILLUSTRATION OF A WATER FILLED BARRIER…………………………………………………………………….. 17

FIGURE V-8:     ILLUSTRATION OF ROCK BARRIERS AROUND AREA DRAINS………………………………………….. 19

FIGURE V-9:     ILLUSTRATION OF A FRAME & FILTER BARRIER FOR AREA DRAINS……………………………… 21

FIGURE V-10: ILLUSTRATION OF A CURB INLET “SUMP” BARRIER…………………………………………………………… 23

FIGURE V-11: ILLUSTRATION OF A CURB INLET DIVERSION BERM………………………………………………………….. 25

FIGURE V-12: ILLUSTRATION OF A CURB AND GUTTER SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM………………. 27

FIGURE V-13: ILLUSTRATION OF AN INLET INSERT SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM………………………. 29

FIGURE V-14: ILLUSTRATION OF A SOIL TRACKING PREVENTION DEVICE…………………………………………….. 31

FIGURE V-15: ILLUSTRATION OF USES FOR CELLULAR CONFINEMENT SYSTEMS………………………………… 33

FIGURE V-16: ILLUSTRATION OF USING BMPS WHILE BUILDING BOX CULVERTS………………………………. 36

INTRODUCTION

Examples of sediment control methods commonly found on construction sites are barriers. These structures are usually inexpensive and easy to install. Also, since their effectiveness is minimal for large runoff events, they do not require the detailed design needed for sediment containment systems. However, they are expensive Best Management Practices (BMPs) to use when considering the need for frequent maintenance.

USING BARRIERS TO REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM RUNOFF WATERS

A barrier is any structure that obstructs or prevents the passage of water. If runoff cannot pass through a barrier, then water will either be contained or flow over the structure. Consequently, small sediment barriers may function as a small SCS or as a method to reduce flow velocity.

Some examples of commonly used sediment barriers are:

• Silt fences
• Inlet barriers
• Diversion barriers

Appropriate places for sediment barriers are:

• Along sections of a site perimeter
• Below disturbed areas subject to sheet and rill erosion
• Below the toe of exposed and erodible slopes
• Along the toe of stream and channel banks
• Around area drains or inlets located in a “sump” when properly supported
  • Downstream edge of areas undergoing vertical and/or big box construction activities Inappropriate places for sediment barriers include:
  • Parallel to a hillside contour
  • In channels where concentrated flows occur, unless properly reinforced
  • Upstream or downstream of culverts where concentrated flows occur
  • In front of or around inlets on a grade where concentrated flows occur
  • In flowing streams

Illustrations of different barriers commonly used on construction sites appear in Figures within this section.

Limitation of Bale Barriers

Use of straw or hay bales has traditionally been one of the more popular methods used in trying to reduce sediment from construction sites. Unfortunately, their widespread use does not justify the fact that they are relatively ineffective. It is for this and other reasons that the FDOT does not allow use of straw or hay bale barriers on construction sites.

Silt-Fence Barriers

Silt (also known as sediment) fence barriers consist of geosynthetic material placed in a manner that controls sheet flow from disturbed lands (see Figure V-2). Except for very large diameter (e.g. sand) particles, silt fences do not “filter” sediment out of runoff waters. Instead, the effectiveness of a silt fence is dependent upon its ability to create a small “containment system” to allow for deposition of suspended particles.

If a silt fence is to be successful in removing sediment from runoff waters, installation must occur in a manner that allows for the deposition of suspended particles. Consequently, proper installation and continued maintenance is essential.

Fiber Logs

Fiber logs (a.k.a. fiber rolls or wattles) are beginning to be used more extensively on construction sites. These tightly bound “logs” of material (see Figure V-3) must be viewed as a barrier that is simulating bales. As such, they must be installed correctly, will require extensive maintenance, and have limited use.

Installing fiber logs along hillsides will provide a temporary erosion control BMP. However, proper seeding and mulching will be more effective in stabilizing disturbed slopes. Usually, fiber logs should not be used in drainage channels since they will be impacted by large flows. However, their use on vertical and/or big box construction sites might be appropriate where small runoff events occur.

Temporary Compost Berms

Temporary compost berms are commonly found where runoff sheet flows from a site. Examples include at the base of hills and along the downstream edges of lots where homes are being built.

Typical berm materials include shredded wood (wood chips, wood bark, wood cellulose fiber, and wood excelsior) and “green” material (vegetative trimmings such as grass, shredded shrubs, and trees).

Tests in Texas have shown compost berms do not have much resistance to failure unless a root structure is found within the material. Thus, it is important that when these containment systems are installed, vegetation be established as soon as possible.

Area-Drain (a.k.a. Drop, Catch Basin, or Ditch Bottom) Inlet Barriers

Placing barriers around an area drain or drop inlet must be avoided unless it is located in a low area that receives runoff from surrounding lands (i.e. in a “sump”). When the drain is located on a grade, runoff diverted by the barrier might cause significant downstream flooding problems as depicted in Figure V-1.

When not in a sump condition, placing barriers upstream of the structure and across a drainage channel perpendicular to the flow should be considered. The barriers will create a SCS and the drainage system will continue to remove runoff waters to reduce the potential of downstream flooding. Attention should be given to the surrounding topography and placement of the upstream barrier so that runoff waters flow over, and not around, the structure.

Figure V-124:How Barriers Around Area Drains on a Grade Fail During Runoff Events

When sump conditions exist, various methods exist to allow for ponding of runoff. For example, installing rock or fabric filter (having adequate support) barriers or placing a fiber log having a height of at least 12-inches might be alternatives. However, use of silt fence barriers is not recommended unless properly installed and supported.

Barriers for Storm Sewer Curb Inlet Openings

Placing rock barriers in front of inlets where street grades exist prevents the capturing of flows in gutters. Once runoff waters are prevented from entering inlets, downstream flooding becomes a major problem.

Only when a curb inlet is at a sump location should placement of a rock or coral barrier in front of a curb inlet occur. Otherwise, the possibility of diverting runoff waters away from the inlet and causing downstream flooding exists. In addition, at no time should rock or coral completely cover the opening of an inlet. Finally, install warning signs to alert drivers about potential damage to vehicles.

The advantage of using rock or coral barriers at curb inlets is that they will drain and reduce ponding around the inlet when sump conditions exist. However, maximum efficiency will be realized only by collecting runoff behind the barrier. Once runoff waters flow over the top and into the inlet, little sediment will be captured (Fifield, 1997).

A reported (by contractors) disadvantage of allowing runoff to pond in front of an inlet is the damage that often occurs to the pavement. As water seeps between the concrete and asphalt junction, structural integrity may become compromised and could cause damage to the road.

Curb and Gutter Sediment Containment System

Figure V-12 illustrates how placing rock or sand bags in a gutter flow line will create small SCS on streets having a grade. When properly installed, deposition of sediment will occur without compromising the role of an inlet to capture runoff waters in gutters.

One would think that rock bags are recommended over sand bags to allow for drainage. However, rock bags tend to be rigid whereas partially filled sand bags conform to the gutter system. In addition, rock bags tend to become clogged with sediment and function similar to sand bags, which is as barriers.

When installed in the gutter, bag tops must be lower than the curb height. As with all barriers, these systems will capture only a small amount of the total suspended particles found in runoff waters. Hence, they are more effective for small runoff events.

Inlet Inserts

During the grading phase of a project, it is advisable to install fabric under a grate or within a storm sewer opening to prevent soil from entering the system. However, these fabrics will become clogged and prevent the passage of water into a storm sewer system. As a result, once pavement is placed or developed conditions exist for vertical construction, localized flooding occurs.

Designers must clearly indicate on the E&SC plans that placing fabric material in a manner that totally blocks (e.g. under grates) runoff waters entering a storm sewer system will result in localized flooding. Inlet inserts overcome this problem by catching sediment but not preventing runoff from entering the storm sewer system. They are placed inside the inlet structure to treat incoming flows. Refer to Figure V-13 for more information on inlet inserts.

Inflow waters continually stir the captured soil before discharging into existing drainage pipes. Thus, only a small amount of the total suspended particles found in runoff waters are actually captured. However, the ability of an inlet to control drainage is not compromised. As with all SCSs, continual maintenance of the inserts must occur.

Cellular Confinement Systems

When conditions result in high flow values, it may be necessary to install cellular confinement systems. These rigid units can be installed on hillsides, in drainage ditches, as a soil tracking prevention device, or serve as temporary stream crossings. Each system has cells in which rock, soil, or cement can be placed. Once this occurs, increased stabilization exists creating a system that can withstand large loads while preventing erosion. Refer to Figure V-15 for additional information on cellular confinement systems.

Using Polymers to Increase Sediment Removal from Runoff Waters

Temporary sediment control measures by themselves are not very effective in removing sediment from runoff waters. However, their efficiency can increase by properly applying polymers. Some of these techniques include the following (see Appendix III):

1. Apply soil-specific polymer surrounding an area drain and cover the soil with a layer of jute fabric.
2. Install polymer logs inside and/or upstream of water conveyance devices to treat runoff after it has moved through a rock barrier.
3. Place the polymer logs so that runoff within a drainage channel having check structures will flow over and around them. The number of logs is determined by the flow rate of the water. Longer mixing times will have the best reduction of turbidity.
4. Cover rock check structures with jute fabric that has been applied with a site-specific polymer powder.

It is important that Designers work with professionals that are experienced in using polymers on construction sites. In this manner, potential environmental problems can be professionally addressed and problems avoided.

Silt Fence Barrier

WHAT IS ITS PURPOSE?

Temporary sediment containment structures while construction activities occur.

WHERE AND HOW IS IT COMMONLY USED?

WHEN SHOULD IT BE INSTALLED?

■         Before construction activities begin.

■         While construction activities are occurring.

WHEN SHOULD IT NOT BE INSTALLED?

■         Where concentrated flows are expected such as in drainage ditches, around inlets, and above/below where culverts discharge.

■         After construction activities are completed.

WHAT NEEDS TO BE INSPECTED?

WHAT MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES CAN BE EXPECTED?

NOTES

■         Silt fence barriers are not to be used where concentrated flows of water are anticipated such as in drainage ditches, around inlets, or above/below where culverts discharge.

■         When installed properly, silt fence barriers can create Type-2 sediment containment systems to allow for deposition of suspended particles, especially on vertical/big box construction sites.

■         Silt fence barriers do not filter small-suspended particles in runoff waters.

■         Using wire backing for support is discouraged due to disposal problems.

■         Compacting trench fill material is very critical.

Figure V-2:    Illustration of a Silt Fence Barrier

Permission is given by HydroDynamics Incorporated to copy and reproduce this detail

Fiber Log Barriers for Individual Lots

WHAT IS ITS PURPOSE?

Temporary sediment containment structures while construction activities occur.

WHERE AND HOW IS IT COMMONLY USED?

WHEN SHOULD IT BE INSTALLED?

■         Before construction activities begin.

■         While construction activities are occurring.

WHEN SHOULD IT NOT BE INSTALLED?

■         Where concentrated flows are expected such as in drainage ditches, around inlets, and above/below where culverts discharge.

■         After construction activities are completed.

WHAT NEEDS TO BE INSPECTED?

WHAT MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES CAN BE EXPECTED?

NOTES

■         Fiber logs are not to be used where concentrated flows of water are anticipated (e.g. in drainage ditches, around inlets, or above/below where culverts discharge) unless properly installed.

■         Fiber logs can create a very small Type-2 sediment containment system to allow for deposition of suspended particles on vertical/big box construction sites.

■         Fiber logs do not filter small (e.g. clay) suspended particles in runoff waters.

Figure V-3.     Illustration of Fiber Log Barriers for Individual Lots

Permission is given by HydroDynamics Incorporated to copy and reproduce this detail

Continuous Berm Barrier

WHAT IS ITS PURPOSE?

Temporary sediment containment structures while construction activities occur.

WHERE AND HOW IS IT COMMONLY USED?

WHEN SHOULD IT BE INSTALLED?

■         Before construction activities begin.

■         While construction activities are occurring.

WHEN SHOULD IT NOT BE INSTALLED?

■         After construction activities are completed.

WHAT NEEDS TO BE INSPECTED?

WHAT MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES CAN BE EXPECTED?

Figure V-4:    Illustration of a Continuous Berm Barrier

Permission is given by HydroDynamics Incorporated to copy and reproduce this detail

Geosynthetic Barrier

WHAT IS ITS PURPOSE?

Temporary sediment containment structures while construction activities occur.

WHERE AND HOW IS IT COMMONLY USED?

WHEN SHOULD IT BE INSTALLED?

■         Before construction activities begin.

■         While construction activities are occurring.

WHEN SHOULD IT NOT BE INSTALLED?

■         After construction activities are completed.

WHAT NEEDS TO BE INSPECTED?

WHAT MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES CAN BE EXPECTED?

Figure V-5:    Illustration of a Geosynthetic Barrier

Permission is given by HydroDynamics Incorporated to copy and reproduce this detail

Turbidity Barrier

WHAT IS ITS PURPOSE?

Temporary sediment containment structures installed in water bodies while construction activities occur.

WHERE AND HOW IS IT COMMONLY USED?

WHEN SHOULD IT BE INSTALLED?

■         Before construction activities begin.

■         While construction activities are occurring.

WHEN SHOULD IT NOT BE INSTALLED?

■         Where water currents move the curtain and dislodge collected sediments.

■         After construction activities are completed.

WHAT NEEDS TO BE INSPECTED?

WHAT MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES CAN BE EXPECTED?

NOTES

■         Do not install turbidity barriers where the flow of water will remove accumulated sediment and/or significantly move the curtain (e.g. in areas where tidal flows exist).

■         When used in a live stream, turbidity barriers must be installed parallel, not perpendicular, to the water flow.

■         Removal of captured sediment behind the curtain may need to occur prior to removing the barrier.

Figure V-6:    Illustration of a Turbidity Barrier Curtain

Permission is given by HydroDynamics Incorporated to copy and reproduce this detail

Water Filled Barrier

WHAT IS ITS PURPOSE?

Temporary containment structures that force water away from a construction site as activities occur to create a “dry” working space.

WHERE AND HOW IS IT COMMONLY USED?

WHEN SHOULD IT BE INSTALLED?

■         Before construction activities begin.

■         While construction activities are occurring.

WHEN SHOULD IT NOT BE INSTALLED?

■         Streams where high flows could destroy the barrier.

■         After construction activities are completed.

WHAT NEEDS TO BE INSPECTED?

WHAT MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES CAN BE EXPECTED?

NOTES

■         A water-filled barrier provides a temporary work area where extensive amounts of water can be anticipated.

■         Sediment-laden waters are to be pumped away from the barrier using a sediment containment filter bag.

Figure V-7:    Illustration of a Water Filled Barrier

Permission is given by HydroDynamics Incorporated to copy and reproduce this detail

Rock Barrier for an Area Drain (a.k.a. Drop, Catch Basin, or Ditch Bottom) Inlet

WHAT IS ITS PURPOSE?

Temporary barriers to cause waters to pond and drain so that sediment can settle out of runoff waters while construction activities occur.

WHERE AND HOW IS IT COMMONLY USED?

WHEN SHOULD IT BE INSTALLED?

■         While construction activities are occurring.

■         Only where sump conditions exist.

WHEN SHOULD IT NOT BE INSTALLED?

■         After construction activities are completed.

■         Where sump conditions do not exist.

WHAT NEEDS TO BE INSPECTED?

WHAT MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES CAN BE EXPECTED?

NOTES

■         Rock barriers placed around inlets will allow water to drain.

■         Use only wire mesh instead of materials such as chicken wire.

■         Rock barriers are to be installed in “sump” conditions only. Rock barriers in front of inlets on a grade will divert runoff to downstream locations.

■         Rock barriers in front of inlets provide little filtering and capture little sediment from runoff waters for large frequency storm events.

Figure V-8:    Illustration of Rock Barriers around Area Drains

Permission is given by HydroDynamics Incorporated to copy and reproduce this detail

Frame & Filter Barrier for Area Drain (a.k.a. Drop, Catch Basin, or Ditch Bottom) Inlets

WHAT IS ITS PURPOSE?

Temporary barriers to cause waters to pond and drain so that sediment can settle out of runoff waters while construction activities occur.

WHERE AND HOW IS IT COMMONLY USED?

WHEN SHOULD IT BE INSTALLED?

■         While construction activities are occurring.

■         Only where “sump” conditions exist.

WHEN SHOULD IT NOT BE INSTALLED?

■         After construction activities are completed.

■         Where “sump” conditions do not exist.

■         In locations that could lead to potential flooding such as encroachment on travel lanes of a roadway.

WHAT NEEDS TO BE INSPECTED?

WHAT MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES CAN BE EXPECTED?

NOTES

■         These barriers are to be installed in “sump” conditions only. If placed in front of inlets on a grade, runoff will be diverted to downstream locations and could cause flooding.

■         It is critical that a good seal exist between the ground and fabric material using adequate amounts of soil or gravel.

■         Multiple types of filter media are available for this system. The correct type of filter fabric should be chosen that considers both safety and environmental concerns.

Figure V-9:    Illustration of a Frame & Filter Barrier for Area Drains

Permission is given by HydroDynamics Incorporated to copy and reproduce this detail

Curb Inlet “Sump” Barrier

WHAT IS ITS PURPOSE?

Temporary barriers to cause waters to pond and drain so that sediment can settle out of runoff waters while construction activities occur.

WHERE AND HOW ARE THEY COMMONLY USED?

WHEN SHOULD IT BE INSTALLED?

■         While construction activities are occurring.

■         Only where “sump” conditions exist.

WHEN SHOULD IT NOT BE INSTALLED?

■         After construction activities are completed.

■         Where “sump” conditions do not exist.

WHAT NEEDS TO BE INSPECTED?

WHAT MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES CAN BE EXPECTED?

NOTES

■         Rock barriers are to be installed in “sump” conditions only.

■         Wire mesh should be used instead of more open materials such as chicken wire.

■         Rock barriers in front of inlets provide little filtering effect and capture little sediment from runoff waters.

■         Warning signs should be used to alert drivers of the structures.

■         Rock barriers in front of inlets may cause destruction of the pavement due to excess seepage of water or freezing conditions.

■         If placed on a grade, the structure will divert runoff downstream and may cause flooding.

Figure V-10:      Illustration of a Curb Inlet “Sump” Barrier

Permission is given by HydroDynamics Incorporated to copy and reproduce this detail

Curb Inlet Diversion Berm

WHAT IS ITS PURPOSE?

Temporary barriers to force runoff into a curb inlet when a downstream sediment containment system exists.

WHERE AND HOW IS IT COMMONLY USED?

WHEN SHOULD IT BE INSTALLED?

■         While construction activities are occurring.

■         At any curb inlet.

WHEN SHOULD IT NOT BE INSTALLED?

■         After construction activities are completed.

■         Where diverted runoff will not enter a sediment containment system.

WHAT NEEDS TO BE INSPECTED?

WHAT MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES CAN BE EXPECTED?

NOTES

■         Warning signs should be used to alert drivers of the structures.

Figure V-11: Illustration of a Curb Inlet Diversion Berm

Permission is given by HydroDynamics Incorporated to copy and reproduce this detail

Curb and Gutter Sediment Containment System Detail

WHAT IS ITS PURPOSE?

Temporary barriers to cause waters to pond and drain so that sediment can settle out of runoff waters while construction activities occur.

WHERE AND HOW IS IT COMMONLY USED?

WHEN SHOULD IT BE INSTALLED?

■         While construction activities are occurring.

■         Where street grades exist.

WHEN SHOULD IT NOT BE INSTALLED?

■         After construction activities are completed.

■         Where “sump” conditions exist.

WHAT NEEDS TO BE INSPECTED?

WHAT MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES CAN BE EXPECTED?

NOTES

■         Vehicles will destroy the bags.

■         Warning signs should be used to alert drivers of the structures.

■         Sediment must be removed after every runoff event.

■         Water should not be allowed to remain behind the bags.

Figure V-12:        Illustration of a Curb and Gutter Sediment Containment System

Permission is given by HydroDynamics Incorporated to copy and reproduce this detail

Curb Inlet Insert

WHAT IS ITS PURPOSE?

Temporary SCS inserted into an inlet to capture larger diameter sediments found in runoff waters.

WHERE AND HOW ARE THEY COMMONLY USED?

WHEN SHOULD IT BE INSTALLED?

■         While construction activities are occurring.

■         Within inlets that are on a grade or in a sump.

WHEN SHOULD IT NOT BE INSTALLED?

■         At a location to serve as the only sediment containment system.

WHAT NEEDS TO BE INSPECTED?

WHAT MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES CAN BE EXPECTED?

NOTES

■         Be sure to empty the units before winter conditions occur.

■         Do not rely on these units to be the only sediment control devices on a construction site.

Figure V-13:        Illustration of an Inlet Insert Sediment Containment System

Permission is given by HydroDynamics Incorporated to copy and reproduce this detail

Soil Tracking Prevention Device

WHAT IS ITS PURPOSE?

Temporary structures to assist with removal of soil material captured on vehicle tires entering and leaving a construction site.

WHERE AND HOW IS IT COMMONLY USED?

■         Major entrances into construction sites.

WHEN SHOULD IT BE INSTALLED?

WHEN SHOULD IT NOT BE INSTALLED?

■         After construction activities are completed.

WHAT NEEDS TO BE INSPECTED?

WHAT MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES CAN BE EXPECTED?

Figure V-14:      Illustration of a Soil Tracking Prevention Device

Permission is given by HydroDynamics Incorporated to copy and reproduce this detail

Cellular Confinement System

WHAT IS ITS PURPOSE?

To protect hillsides or drainage channels against erosion due to flowing water or to be used as a temporary stream crossing.

WHERE AND HOW IS IT COMMONLY USED?

■         In areas where concentrated flows occur and where greater erosion protection is needed that exceeds what a Rolled Erosion Control Product (RECP) provides.

■         Provides a temporary stream crossing system that is able to withstand heavy loads and traffic.

WHEN SHOULD IT BE INSTALLED?

■         While construction activities are occurring.

■         After construction activities are finished.

WHEN SHOULD IT NOT BE INSTALLED?

Over impervious surfaces.

WHAT NEEDS TO BE INSPECTED?

WHAT MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES CAN BE EXPECTED?

NOTES

■         Possibly can be used as a temporary soil tracking prevention device.

Figure V-15:        Illustration of uses for Cellular Confinement Systems

Permission is given by HydroDynamics Incorporated to copy and reproduce this detail

Using BMPs When Building Box Culverts

Sections III, IV, and V provide illustrations of many different BMPs that can be utilized before, during, and after construction activities occur. Figure V-16 illustrates four different scenarios that might be considered in using different BMPs during the construction of box culverts.

Scenario No. 1:      If a Designer is confident that offsite runoff waters will not discharge through the construction activity area, the only BMPs that may be necessary are properly installed silt fence barriers, slope drains, and erosion control of the embankments. Also, this scenario assumes that access to the construction site is through an existing (or under construction) roadway. Some important items for Designers to consider include:

• Concentrated off-site flows cannot discharge through the construction site.
• Access to the construction site is through an existing road.
• Topsoil storage, staging, and access to the site must be completed in a manner that ensures runoff from these areas discharge into a temporary containment system created by the silt fence barrier.
  • A slope drain is installed to ensure road runoff is conveyed down the fill slope and away from the active construction site.
  • Erosion protection of disturbed slopes must occur as soon as possible.

Scenario No. 2:      Consideration of this scenario can occur when periodic offsite flows will not inundate the construction site and/or access cannot occur from an existing roadway. Some important items for Designers to consider include:

• Only periodic and small concentrated off-site flows will discharge through the construction site.
• All temporary earthen berms must be stabilized against erosion while construction activities occur.
• Topsoil storage and staging must be completed in a manner that ensures runoff from these areas discharge into the temporary containment system created by the earthen berm and rock outlet structure.
  • Frequent maintenance activities can be expected to remove accumulated sediments and runoff waters.
  • A silt fence barrier is required along the downstream side of an access road.
  • A slope drain may be required to ensure road runoff is conveyed down the fill slope and away from the active construction site.
  • Erosion protection of disturbed slopes must occur as soon as possible.

Scenario No. 3 and No. 4:     These scenarios are perturbations of the first two scenarios when offsite flows need to be diverted and/or installation of box culverts occur through an existing or developing roadway. Along with items identified above, Designers also need to consider the following:

• If pumping is to occur, sufficient containment volume must exist for the anticipated inflow of offsite waters and removal by pumping.

• Erosion protection of any diversion channels and embankments must occur while construction activities happen.

V-35

Figure V-16: Illustration of Using BMPs While Building Box Culverts

Permission is given by HydroDynamics Incorporated to copy and reproduce this detail

V 36

APPENDIX I.

COASTAL APPLICATIONS

Design Examples

Photos of Application

Soil tackifier applied by sprayer truck (Source: Soiltac®, 2006)                     Soil binder and seed mixture applied near coastal bay

(Source: Soiltac®, 2006)

APPENDIX II.

DEWATERING OPERATIONS

APPENDIX III

POLYMERS AND ALUM

APPENDIX IV

INSPECTION AND SCHEDULING FORMS

APPENDIX V

EXAMPLE PLANS AND DETAILS